Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An unscientific poll RE; Credence of Creeds(AKA a vanity)
self | 3/31/2004 | conservonator

Posted on 03/31/2004 1:18:22 PM PST by conservonator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Quester
see post #17
21 posted on 04/01/2004 7:29:39 AM PST by conservonator (Blank by popular demand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Quester
see post #17. And don't you find it curious that nearly everyone has found it either difficult or of no interest to give a simple yes or no answer?
22 posted on 04/01/2004 7:31:10 AM PST by conservonator (Blank by popular demand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Yikes! Now I'm really confused because the article I posted in #5 says:

“The Nicene Creed is accepted by almost all Protestant, Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches, and it offers a basis for unity. Unfortunately, however, it has also been at the center of a controversy between Western and Eastern churches.”

I’ll have to verify.

23 posted on 04/01/2004 7:41:57 AM PST by HarleyD (For strong is he who carries out God's word. (Joel 2:11))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: conservonator; nate4one
see post #17.

So you assume the respondent identifies as a protestant ?

I don't think that he/she does.

And don't you find it curious that nearly everyone has found it either difficult or of no interest to give a simple yes or no answer?

Actually I don't find it to be so.

The response may, simply, point to a disinterest in a simple avowal/disavowal of the creeds.

I do note that this particular (non)response appears to cut across the lines of church-identity.

24 posted on 04/01/2004 7:42:58 AM PST by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
The Eastern Orthodox, and some of the Eastern Catholic Churches, say the Nicene Creed without the "Filioque," or as you put it, "the expanded version."
25 posted on 04/01/2004 7:49:41 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Minister for the Conversion of Hardened Sinners,Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Quester
Nate is nither Catholic nor is he a LDS.

If you refuse to face the reality of the situation it does not change the reality of the situation.

26 posted on 04/01/2004 7:52:17 AM PST by conservonator (Blank by popular demand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: conservonator
Nate is nither Catholic nor is he a LDS.

And you construe that this is the definition of a Protestant ?

If you refuse to face the reality of the situation it does not change the reality of the situation.

To what 'situation' do you refer ?

27 posted on 04/01/2004 7:58:08 AM PST by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: conservonator; Quester
"No Protestant has given you a simple yes or no?!?

Excuse me! What do I look like chop liver! I gave you a "Yes". (Please see post #5.)

All the Protestants I know believe in the Nicene Creed. As pointed out, the area of contention isn't among Protestants but among the Western and Eastern Catholic Church. A fact you seem to wish to ignore.

But posting unscientific polls and then making faulty, if not fallacious, assumptions seems to be the norm for some.

28 posted on 04/01/2004 8:04:15 AM PST by HarleyD (For strong is he who carries out God's word. (Joel 2:11))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Quester
And you construe that this is the definition of a Protestant ?

Let's see...If someone is not a Catholic or an Orthodox yet claims to be a Christian...Yes, I use the term Protestant to identify non-Catholic and non-Orthodox Christians. (LDS and JW are not to my knowledge, Christians )

To what 'situation' do you refer ?

The disunity of agreement regarding what is and is not central to the faith.

29 posted on 04/01/2004 8:05:57 AM PST by conservonator (Blank by popular demand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Quester
Rather ironic and sad that Protestants who believe in the creeds of the early church are consider heretics and the Catholics who can't agree on them are consider bethern.

Oh, well...as long as they kiss the Pope's ring I guess.
30 posted on 04/01/2004 8:13:08 AM PST by HarleyD (For strong is he who carries out God's word. (Joel 2:11))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; Quester
I'm not the one who said that all Protestants agree with all aspects of the two creeds, Quester did. This is merely an attempt to take a small and admittedly unscientific snapshot of the sentiment regarding that ascertation here on FR. As far as the filioque debate, the Church deems either form acceptable so it's a moot point.
31 posted on 04/01/2004 8:14:23 AM PST by conservonator (Blank by popular demand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
the area of contention isn't among Protestants but among the Western and Eastern Catholic Church.

No, the area of contention is between the Catholic and Orthodox churches. Both accept the Nicene creed, but the Orthodox don't accept the westernized version with the filioque.

32 posted on 04/01/2004 8:14:59 AM PST by Titanites (DN IHS CHS REX REGNANTIUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: conservonator
And you construe that this is the definition of a Protestant ?

Let's see...If someone is not a Catholic or an Orthodox yet claims to be a Christian...Yes, I use the term Protestant to identify non-Catholic and non-Orthodox Christians. (LDS and JW are not to my knowledge, Christians )


There are a number of persons who claim Christianity who, yet, reject the labels Catholic, Orthodox, or Protestant.

True Protestants (by self-definition) confess to a core set of essential beliefs (at the very least ... those outlined in the Apostles'/Nicene creeds).

In truth, such defines us as surely as Catholics are defined by their allegiance to the Pope.

We just tend to be more inclusive (we use the scriptures as our basis for christian inclusivity).

33 posted on 04/01/2004 8:19:15 AM PST by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Titanites
That is NOT what my two articles on two different websites that I have referred to says. I'm not saying that you're wrong but I have looked through a number of websites and they all say the same thing. If you could provide me with a different reference for verification that supports what you are saying I would appreciate it.
34 posted on 04/01/2004 8:22:40 AM PST by HarleyD (For strong is he who carries out God's word. (Joel 2:11))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: conservonator; HarleyD
I'm not the one who said that all Protestants agree with all aspects of the two creeds, Quester did. This is merely an attempt to take a small and admittedly unscientific snapshot of the sentiment regarding that ascertation here on FR.

... and, so far ... the only self-avowed Protestant (HarleyD) to respond agrees with all the points of the (2) creeds in question.

That's (2), if you count me.

And no Protestant has disavowed the creeds.

35 posted on 04/01/2004 8:24:25 AM PST by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
Preliminary background: the filioque (Latin for "And the Son") is the theological notion that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son, Jesus. This clause is included in the Nicene Creed - seen as a legitimate development - in the Western Catholic Church, but not in the Eastern Orthodox Church, which regards it as a late corruption and heresy.
36 posted on 04/01/2004 8:30:43 AM PST by Titanites (DN IHS CHS REX REGNANTIUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Quester
No wonder you think all protestants agree on the central issues of the faith! You have decided that only those agreeing with your positions are "true" Protestants. So can you identify these groups for me? Or maybe it would be easier to list those groups that fall outside your definition of "protestant". And what about "independent bible believing Christians"? They reject the term "protestant" but insist that they are real Christians nonetheless.

All this diverse unity confuses me.

37 posted on 04/01/2004 8:30:53 AM PST by conservonator (Blank by popular demand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Quester
We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.

Do all Protestant denominations believe in regenerative baptism?

38 posted on 04/01/2004 8:37:21 AM PST by Titanites (DN IHS CHS REX REGNANTIUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Titanites
Thanks for finding this. As I said earlier, and even after reading ALL these different websites, I can't understand why all this fuss about the Nicene Creed.
39 posted on 04/01/2004 8:49:29 AM PST by HarleyD (For strong is he who carries out God's word. (Joel 2:11))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Titanites
We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.

Do all Protestant denominations believe in regenerative baptism?


Yes ... this one ...
Luke 3:15 And as the people were in expectation, and all men mused in their hearts of John, whether he were the Christ, or not;

16 John answered, saying unto them all, I indeed baptize you with water; but one mightier than I cometh, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire:

40 posted on 04/01/2004 8:55:32 AM PST by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson