[nickcarraway]

Come now, you are expanding the definition of Feeneyism. Even the Cathechism would be Feenyite by that definition. Feeney's problem was what he taught about Baptism of Desire and Baptism by Blood, but he was excommunicated for disobedience, and for private interpretation of Scripture. Basically, Certain issues about salvation have not been setlled infallibly by the Church. There is a range of opinions within the Church, the one can hold without out being outside the bounds of Church teaching. So, one can hold a few different positions on salvation, but you van't claim that that interpretation is the only one taught by the Church.

[Aquinasfan]

I think Sungenis' position is outside of the realm of acceptable teaching. Notice that the article is posted on a Feenyite website.

[OLD REGGIE]

Basically, Certain issues about salvation have not been setlled infallibly by the Church. There is a range of opinions within the Church, the one can hold without out being outside the bounds of Church teaching. So, one can hold a few different positions on salvation, but you van't claim that that interpretation is the only one taught by the Church.

You bring up a question I have asked several times without an answer to date.

Is Unum Sanctum infallible? If so, what is open to discussion?