Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Tares
What is inappropriate about it?

Tautology is usually used to denote something trivial. I don't find God revealing His Name, and His Nature trivial.

It's certainly not parallel to the original example given, which if interpreted in the Calvin way, is extremely trivial and trite.

SD

3,960 posted on 04/13/2004 10:52:15 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3958 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave; the808bass
Tautology is usually used to denote something trivial. I don't find God revealing His Name, and His Nature trivial.

Nonetheless, God reveals his name to us. God’s name is a tautology.

tautology - Logical truth. A statement which is necessarily true because, by virtue of its logical form, it cannot be used to make a false assertion.

How perfect for God, he who cannot lie, to reveal himself. God’s use of a tautology in revealing his name is not trivial, and I emphasized that point by replacing my follow-on use of the word truism by the more appropriate tautology. I AM THAT I AM is a non-trivial tautology.

It's certainly not parallel to the original example given, which if interpreted in the Calvin way, is extremely trivial and trite.

It is parallel in that both Exodus 3:13-14 and 2 Peter 3:9, a tautology is used. 2 Peter 3:9 councils patience (among other things) in the saints. That is neither trivial nor trite.

4,005 posted on 04/13/2004 12:57:54 PM PDT by Tares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3960 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson