contains an interesting little article on "I am". If nothing else it shows there are differences in interpretation.
Isn't that "Bruce of TOMY"'s site? The anti-trinitarian-yet-still-Messianic-Jewish website that you found so persuasive, that last year you cited repeatedly as your "proof" that Trinitarian Christianity was wrong about who Jesus was?
Didn't you just announce earlier this month that you no longer believe Bruce of TOMY's assertion that Jesus was still the Messiah? Why would you consider that site authoritative on anything anymore?