Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: IMRight; Religion Moderator
No, I was responding to Dave calling me a "Schmuck."

I didn't realize we could get away with language like that on Free Republic. Perhaps he and you don't know the meaning of the word or its derivation.

Either way, when the conversation reaches this level, it's best to bow out.

I'll be sure to speak well of you both, should the occasion arise.

2,332 posted on 04/07/2004 8:17:55 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2326 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg
Ahhh. Perhaps we're a bit "thin skinned" then? I would have considered "pathetic" to be more insulting/innapropriate, but it's possible that I don't understand the meaning of "schmuck".

I thought it was "an unpleasantly excentric person" but perhaps it's rooted in some vulgarity. I don't happen to think that either is appropriate... but I'm the guy who can't even bring himself to type "he11" or "d@mn".

It does seem a bit like you aren't comfortable answering the inconvenient questions... but hey! That's your right. A little unfair to tag others as being unwilling to answer yours but who am I to judge?

And pinging the moderator on "schmuck" just makes your whole group look bad. It never ceases to amaze me (on both sides) how high and might everyone is on the other side hitting the abuse button. We self-regulate here - and you'll notice that Dave apologized BEFORE you went crying to mama?

2,337 posted on 04/07/2004 8:32:37 AM PDT by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2332 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson