Posted on 03/09/2004 6:51:59 PM PST by IYAAYAS
I find it interesting that yesterday there was another thread about an "anti-semitic" incident. In that one also, the rabbi on hand was quick to push blame for the incident toward Gibson. Is it coincidence that in both cases the rabbi would be such evil bigots, or are a large percentage of rabbis so? Or is there something else afoot? Are we seeing a campaign of artificial incidents set up for a particular purpose? If so, what might that purpose be? Gibson will have hundreds of millions in the bank after "Passion". Have some rabbis and lawyers put together a plan to sue for a chunk of that money? Stay tuned.
I replied, sarcasticly.
Most Rabbis are bigots as you note. In fact most Jews are. They run the world, and this is just part of the plot.
Since you didnt understand, I was being sarcastic. I think you were suggesting that that many Rabbis are evil bigots, but you didnt have the courage to say it, so you posed it as a question.
Cowardly, per loin the brave, have the courage of your convictions. If the Jews are after Gibsons millions through a conspiracy of Rabbis and lawyers, have the courage to say it, rhetorical questions are silly
Per Loin: I've noted no such thing, but I do note that your words are vile bigotry. Please correct your conduct. Such bigotry is not acceptable on this forum.
Sure you did, youre just afraid to support your accusations, not a surprise. The bigotry is yours. Not acceptable, whine all you want, Im sure you know who to ping if you care to make that case to.
However, neither do you have any evidence of a conspiracy between these two rabbis, or any others.
Right, so who is really dividing us?
If you can't take sarcasm back, don't attempt to dish it out.
I think you were suggesting that that many Rabbis are evil bigots, but you didn't have the courage to say it, so you posed it as a question.
In fact, if you'll dismount from your "victim of everything" complex long enough to read what I wrote, you'll understand that I was pointing out the implausibility of these two evil bigots being the rabbi at hand to comment on these two incidents. If I believed that many rabbis were such, there would have been no reason to question whether there was "something else afoot". Get it yet or are you looking for new aspects of your self pity?
I wonder when the police find the people who distributed the fliers what they plan to charge them with. Is it illegal to distribute fliers with a hateful message? Does this qualify as a hate crime? If not, what would be the charge? The only one that really seems to apply is littering, a charge I would certainly support. I find fliers on my lawn, or wedged into my porch railing, or fasted with a rubber band to my doorknob, three or four times a week, usually for tree trimming, lawn mowing, house painting and chimney repair.
In fact, if you'll dismount from your "victim of everything" complex long enough to read what I wrote, you'll understand that I was pointing out the implausibility of these two evil bigots being the rabbi at hand to comment on these two incidents. If I believed that many rabbis were such, there would have been no reason to question whether there was "something else afoot". Get it yet or are you looking for new aspects of your self pity? My perception is that only a small percentage of rabbis would have made such rash and divisive statements. Is that your perception as well?
|
I see, so I am a liberal democrat now because I read to what the man actualy says rather than what I want or expect him to say. Please read it and note that it isnt anti-semitism fuled by the movie, or a backlash from the movie he cites, its backlash about criticism of the movie the rabbi refers to, a very different thing.
When Andy Rooney panned the passion as good for nothing but a few laughs and that Mel Gibson was crazy as a bedbug, people got mad and wrote lots of letters, which Rooney referred to directly, some of which were not at all nice. were the poeple who got mad at him inspired to be so by the movie? No, the backlash came from his stupid comments, and those who already didnt like Rooney doubtltess were the most agitated.
Likewise, the ADL criticim of the Passion certainly caused some backlash even here on FR bcause people took it as an attack on christianity itself. If you don't believe it, read this thread again and see how defensive everyone is and how ready they are to call rabbi's bigots. And this is from freepers, whom I consider to be pretty rational people. Now imagine how the crazy hard core neo-nazi anti-semite scum, who already hate all jews, might react to the perception that the ADL is telling them what to do and see.
Bottom line, religious discussions are emotional, criticism from outsiders is never taken well, and the nuttier you were to begin with, the more wild your response might be.
The ethnic cleansing flier features a montage of pictures of Palestinian children.
Goldstein believes the flier criticizing the ADL may be the result of that organization's criticism of the Mel Gibson movie "The Passion of the Christ," which the league feels portrays Jews in a negative way.
Hashem suspects the leaflets are the work of the Arkansas-based white supremacist group White Revolution.
It seems like the ADL is more bent on blaming Christianity than a preponderance of evidence that points to Islamofascism.
Why do I feel that the ADL and liberal Jews want to create division between Christianity and Judaism?...Very similar to how Jesse Jackson/Maxine Waters/Charles Rangel want to create division between whites and blacks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.