Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HarleyD; Dr. Eckleburg; RnMomof7; Wrigley; Calvinist_Dark_Lord
Here is an interesting interchange: (Note the comments on the KJV at the bottom of this citation.

 

Q: Hi. I would like comments on what to do when a priest teaches that some parts of the bible are just stories to inspire us and did not really happen. Also when confronted with the catechism states that there are many things wrong with the catechism. He is coming next week to our parish. What do I say, do? Thanks, God bless you all. Eileen.

A: Eileen, first I need to define what an Imprimatur is. "Imprimatur • Literally, 'let it be printed,' the imprimatur is required for the publication of certain religious or scriptural texts. Publication of catechisms, prayer books, and books about morals, Scripture, theology, Church history or canon law that will be used as textbooks are to receive the approval of the bishop or other competent ecclesiastical authority before being published."1 Hand-in-hand with the Imprimatur is the Nihil Obstat. "Nihil Obstat • This Latin term, which literally means 'nothing obstructs,' refers to the approval granted by the officially appointed censor of books to a written work that requires the permission of Church authorities for publication. The nihil obstat precedes and is required for the imprimatur, which is the permission of the competent authority to publish it."2 "2. In undertaking the office, the censor, laying aside any respect for persons, is to consider only the teaching of the Church concerning faith and morals as it is proposed by the ecclesiastical magisterium. 3. The censor's opinion must be given in writing; if it is favorable, the ordinary (bishop) in his own prudent judgement, is to grant the permission to publish, giving his own name and the time and place of the granting of the permission."3 The Council Fathers (Vatican II) remind us that in Scripture God speaks in human fashion. From this it follows that 'the interpreter of Scripture, if he is to ascertain what God has wished to communicate to us, should carefully search out the meaning which the sacred writers really had in mind. The Council further specified that the task of giving an authoritative interpretation of the Word of God, whether it is in written form or in the form of Tradition, has been entrusted to the living teaching office of the Church alone (my emphasis.)"4 "The signature of a bishop in your Bible assures you that opinions, expressed in footnotes and introductions, reflect what is generally accepted as sound doctrine in the Catholic tradition."5

So, when you read a bible make certain it is one with an Imprimatur and Nihil Obstat. This will insure that the cover-to-cover contents, including teaching footnotes and introductions explaining the scriptures, are accurate teachings approved by Holy Church. For example, The New American Bible - St. Joseph Edition says in The Book of Jonah that Jonah disobeyed the Lord so he was swallowed by a whale for three days before being disgorged and sent on his mission. In the introduction to the Book of Jonah, the censor tells us that this 'story' is a sublime lesson telling us that, "Jonah stands for a narrow and vindictive mentality, all too common of the Jews of that period".6 With the previous explanation in mind concerning the Imprimatur and Nihil Obstat, we know that the introduction just quoted about the Book of Jonah is an approved and accepted teaching of the Church. In the situation of Jonah being swallowed by a whale, this is a 'story' used to teach about the mentality of the Jews at that time.

A King James Version of the bible will not have either an Imprimatur or Nihil Obstat as it has many translation errors and cannot be approved by the Catholic Church. I am not saying that a KJV of the bible is totally inaccurate as it does contain some truths.

 

11 posted on 03/04/2004 6:55:29 AM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: drstevej
Here is an interesting interchange: (Note the comments on the KJV at the bottom of this citation.

Surely it's not news to you that the KJV is not a Catholic Bible?

SD

13 posted on 03/04/2004 7:16:51 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: drstevej
Interesting comment on the KJV:

I am not saying that a KJV of the bible is totally inaccurate as it does contain some truths.

I guess Ephesians 2:8-10 isn't one of them.

20 posted on 03/04/2004 8:27:08 AM PST by Ephesians210
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson