[RaginCajunTrad]

"If an indult mass is available..."

I do not know of ultima's situation, however I have heard of indult masses with the words of consecration changed (pro multis to pro omnibus) and only the priest being allowed to communicate with a host consecrated at the indult mass. For the congregation, the priest is required to use hosts consectrated at a Novus Ordo mass.

I have not personally experienced this, but was told by someone who I trust who did experience this.

[Tantumergo]

"however I have heard of indult masses with the words of consecration changed (pro multis to pro omnibus)"

Do you also believe that Elvis is alive and well on Mars?

Even the Latin of the N.O. has "pro multis" rather than "pro omnibus" - it has simply been falsely translated in the English version.

"only the priest being allowed to communicate with a host consecrated at the indult mass. For the congregation, the priest is required to use hosts consectrated at a Novus Ordo mass."

Would you also like to buy a bridge in Brooklyn that I own?

Do you really think that any priest who has the guts to say the traditional Mass in today's Church would not have the guts to ensure that everybody communed with hosts consecrated at that Mass?

Please!!! The abuses in the N.O. are quite bad enough without people inventing new ones or trying to besmirch indult Masses by association!!!

[autopsy]

For the congregation, the priest is required to use hosts consectrated at a Novus Ordo mass.

I have witnessed this. The problem is, if we are not even allowed to witness the Consecration, then how do we know that Sister Mary Bulldyke didn't simply place unconsecrated hosts in the Tabernacle?