Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: rogator
I understand that you find the traditional Latin Mass more pleasing and that it is your personal preference. I do not believe that changing the language the mass is said in, etc., is contrary to the teachings of Christ.

I think a humble gathering of the devout worshipping in their own language - Aramaic - is exactly what happened at the Last Supper.

Thus, I do see some irony in Gibson's simultaneously making a movie where Christ speaks in the vernacular, but attending a church where the priest does not.

But I don't think it's any big deal. I am comfortable with the mass in English and the other changes made in Vatican II. I was very young when they occurred, don't have much invested in the old status quo.
179 posted on 02/20/2004 10:45:16 AM PST by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: CobaltBlue
But vatican II did not direct ripping out altar rails, removing religious statues, turning around the altar, and introducing "profane" music to services. This is part of what I am referring to as traditional Catholic worship practices.
187 posted on 02/20/2004 11:08:22 AM PST by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson