To: Diago; narses; Loyalist; BlackElk; american colleen; saradippity; Polycarp; Dajjal; ...
An outstanding and thorough reporting job by Dr. Thomas Drolesky. Someone at least is acknowledging the courage of Stephen Brady. How ironic that a pizza parlor owner should be the one to start the ball rolling on exposing the ring of corruption run by homosexual pervert bishops.
Notice also the many similarities with the current case in Albany. Someone just asked on the Albany thread which was the case where the Papal Nuncio sent back to the bishop the confidential names of his accusers. Here it is.
I hate to believe that Hubbard would tell bold-faced lies to the diocese and to the news media, but this story proves that other bishops have not hesitated to do so. No matter what we may have against liberal "street priests" like Hubbard, as long as he is willing to stand up there and categorically deny everything it seems only charitable to give him the benefit of the doubt. But we can also keep in mind that Ryan gave the same categorical denials.
To: Maximilian; NYer
Notice also the many similarities with the current case in Albany. Someone just asked on the Albany thread which was the case where the Papal Nuncio sent back to the bishop the confidential names of his accusers. Thanks. That's certainly unethical. It seems quite disturbing that representatives from the Vatican would just let loyal priests hang out to dry while assisting flawed bishops in covering up. Where there are allegations of crimes that makes the Nuncio potentially involved in obstruction of justice.
If Cardinal O'Connor had indeed raised such concerns about Albany, why is it nothing ever happened from Rome's end? That's very disturbing.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson