Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Mel Owes One to the Jews
WorldNetDaily ^ | February 13, 2004 | Rabbi Daniel Lapin

Posted on 02/13/2004 1:01:13 AM PST by ultima ratio

Why Mel owes one to the Jews

By Rabbi Daniel Lapin © 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

Two weeks before Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" flashes onto two thousand screens, online ticket merchants are reporting that up to half their total sales are for advance purchases for the film. One Dallas multiplex has reserved all 20 of its screens for "The Passion." I am neither a prophet nor a movie critic. I am merely an Orthodox rabbi using ancient Jewish wisdom to make three predictions about "The Passion."

One, Mel Gibson and Icon Productions will make a great deal of money. Those distributors who surrendered to pressure from Jewish organizations and passed on the movie will be kicking themselves, while Newmarket Films will laugh all the way to the bank. Theater owners are going to love this film.

Two, "The Passion" will become famous as the most serious and substantive biblical movie ever made. It will be one of the most talked-about entertainment events in history. It is currently on the cover of Newsweek and Vanity Fair.

My third prediction is that the faith of millions of Christians will become more fervent as "The Passion" uplifts and inspires them. It will propel vast numbers of unreligious Americans to embrace Christianity. The movie will one day be seen as a harbinger of America's third great religious reawakening.

Those Jewish organizations that have squandered both time and money futilely protesting "The Passion," ostensibly in order to prevent pogroms in Pittsburgh, can hardly be proud of their performance. They failed at everything they attempted. They were hoping to ruin Gibson rather than enrich him. They were hoping to suppress "The Passion" rather than promote it. Finally, they were hoping to help Jews rather than harm them.

Here I digress slightly to exercise the Jewish value of "giving the benefit of the doubt" by discounting cynical suggestions growing in popularity that the very public nature of their attack on Gibson exposed their real purpose-fund-raising. Apparently, frightening wealthy widows in Florida about anti-Semitic thugs prowling the streets of America causes them to open their pocketbooks and refill the coffers of groups with little other raison d'être. But let's assume the groups were hoping to help Jews.

However, instead of helping the Jewish community, they have inflicted lasting harm. By selectively unleashing their fury only on wholesome entertainment that depicts Christianity in a positive light, they have triggered anger, hurt and resentment. Hosting the Toward Tradition radio show and speaking before many audiences nationwide, I enjoy extensive communication with Christian America, and what I hear is troubling. Fearful of attracting the ire of Jewish groups that are so quick to hurl the "anti-Semite" epithet, some Christians are reluctant to speak out. Although one can bludgeon resentful people into silence, behind closed doors emotions continue to simmer.

I consider it crucially important for Christians to know that not all Jews are in agreement with their self-appointed spokesmen. Most American Jews, experiencing warm and gracious interactions each day with their Christian fellow citizens, would feel awkward trying to explain why so many Jewish organizations seem focused on an agenda hostile to Judeo-Christian values. Many individual Jews have shared with me their embarrassment that groups, ostensibly representing them, attack "The Passion" but are silent about depraved entertainment that encourages killing cops and brutalizing women.

Citing artistic freedom, Jewish groups helped protect sacrilegious exhibits such as the anti-Christian feces extravaganza presented by the Brooklyn Museum four years ago. One can hardly blame Christians for assuming that Jews feel artistic freedom is important only when exercised by those hostile toward Christianity. However, this is not how all Jews feel.

From audiences around America, I am encountering bitterness at Jewish organizations insisting that belief in the New Testament is de facto evidence of anti-Semitism. Christians heard Jewish leaders denouncing Gibson for making a movie that follows Gospel accounts of the crucifixion long before any of them had even seen the movie.

Furthermore, Christians are hurt that Jewish groups are presuming to teach them what Christian Scripture "really means." Listen to a rabbi whom I debated on the Fox television show hosted by Bill O'Reilly last September. This is what he said, "We have a responsibility as Jews, as thinking Jews, as people of theology, to respond to our Christian brothers and to engage them, be it Protestants, be it Catholics, and say, 'Look, this is not your history, this is not your theology, this does not represent what you believe in.'"

He happens to be a respected rabbi and a good one, but he too has bought into the preposterous proposition that Jews will re-educate Christians about Christian theology and history. Is it any wonder that this breathtaking arrogance spurs bitterness?

Many Christians who, with good reason, have considered themselves to be Jews' best (and perhaps, only) friends also feel bitter at Jews believing that "The Passion" is revealing startling new information about the crucifixion. They are incredulous at Jews thinking that exposure to the Gospels in visual form will instantly transform the most philo-Semitic gentiles of history into snarling, Jew-hating predators.

Christians are baffled by Jews who don't understand that President George Washington, who knew and revered every word of the Gospels, was still able to write that oft-quoted beautiful letter to the Touro Synagogue in Newport, offering friendship and full participation in America to the Jewish community.

One of the directors of the AJC recently warned that "The Passion" "could undermine the sense of community between Christians and Jews that's going on in this country. We're not allowing the film to do that." No sir, it isn't the film that threatens the sense of community; it is the arrogant and intemperate response of Jewish organizations that does so.

Jewish organizations, hoping to help but failing so spectacularly, refute all myths of Jewish intelligence. How could their plans have been so misguided and the execution so inept?

Ancient Jewish wisdom teaches that nothing confuses one's thinking more than being in the grip of the two powerful emotions, love and hate. The actions of these Jewish organizations sadly suggest that they are in the grip of a hatred for Christianity that is only harming Jews.

Today, peril threatens all Americans, both Jews and Christians. Many of the men and women in the front lines find great support in their Christian faith. It is strange that Jewish organizations, purporting to protect Jews, think that insulting allies is the preferred way to carry out that mandate.

A ferocious Rottweiler dog in your suburban home will quickly estrange your family from the neighborhood. For those of us in the Jewish community who cherish friendship with our neighbors, some Jewish organizations have become our Rottweilers. God help us.


TOPICS: Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: christianfaith; gibson; myrabbi; passion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2004 1:01:13 AM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
Wow. It's amazing the effect this film is having on American society prior to it's release. It will surely change many hearts.
2 posted on 02/13/2004 6:22:39 AM PST by autopsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; NYer; narses; Loyalist; AAABEST; ninenot; CAtholic Family Association; ...
Ping!
3 posted on 02/13/2004 6:29:44 AM PST by StAthanasiustheGreat (Vocatus Atque Non Vocatus Deus Aderit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
The rabbi makes good points. Too bad more Jews don't express his optimism in their Christian neighbors.

There is always a possibility, indeed probability, that isolated individuals may use the "Passion" as an excuse to vandalize and "revenge" in the name of Jesus, but if Mel Gibson really captured the spirit of the Gospels, everyone will leave the movie heartbroken, but humbled and forgiving.

Jesus was Jewish. The Apostles were Jewish. First Christians were Jewish. Two thirds of our Bible is Judaic, and all of it is Jewish. Anti-semitism cannot proceed from the Gosples. The message of the Gospels is love, forgivness and hope. Only wicked human nature can find fuel for hatred in the Gospels.

4 posted on 02/13/2004 6:48:45 AM PST by kosta50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
If it were not for the Jews, where would we gentiles be?
5 posted on 02/13/2004 8:20:25 AM PST by franky (Pray for the souls of the faithful departed. Pray for our own souls to receive the grace of a happy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
Remarkable good sense from this rabbi. It would be nice if Michael Jackson's pal Schmuley Boteach and the rest of the rottweileres would learn from his good example.
6 posted on 02/13/2004 9:20:14 AM PST by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autopsy
It's amazing the effect this film is having on American society prior to it's release.

What effect? The only thing I've noticed is Jews crying anti-semite. But that goes on any way. What other effect has this film made?

7 posted on 02/13/2004 9:29:07 AM PST by St.Chuck (Bush, the big government conservative, conserving big government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
The only thing I've noticed is Jews crying anti-semite

Read the article. It's written by a rabbi. He's not crying anti-semitism. I work with a lot of Protestants whose churches have booked entire theatres.

Are you annoyed that a Hollywood film producer can bring people closer to Christ than your local AmChurch bishop or are you just annoyed that it wasn't a Novus Ordo Catholic that produced it?

8 posted on 02/13/2004 9:36:48 AM PST by autopsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: autopsy
Read the article. It's written by a rabbi. He's not crying anti-semitism.

You read it. He's chastising other Jews for their reaction. What reaction? What has the effect been?

I work with a lot of Protestants whose churches have booked entire theatres.

Preaching to the choir.

Are you annoyed that a Hollywood film producer can bring people closer to Christ than your local AmChurch bishop or are you just annoyed that it wasn't a Novus Ordo Catholic that produced it?

I'm only annoyed by purported societal effects, when the film has not even been released yet.

9 posted on 02/13/2004 9:55:11 AM PST by St.Chuck (Bush, the big government conservative, conserving big government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
I'm only annoyed by purported societal effects, when the film has not even been released yet.<P. I know people who have seen it and been very moved by it. Cheer up.
10 posted on 02/13/2004 9:57:39 AM PST by autopsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
"...purported societal effects"

I'm more concerned with the 3,000 babies aborted in the last hour than some satan directed rabble rousers causing societal effects.
11 posted on 02/13/2004 1:17:18 PM PST by franky (Pray for the souls of the faithful departed. Pray for our own souls to receive the grace of a happy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: franky
I'm more concerned with the 3,000 babies aborted in the last hour than some satan directed rabble rousers causing societal effects.

Yup, reducing or eliminating the number of abortions would be a real societal effect.

12 posted on 02/13/2004 1:22:49 PM PST by St.Chuck (Bush, the big government conservative, conserving big government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
I've been reading what Rabbi Lapin writes for years now. I own a couple of books he's written and have long considered him to be an exceptionally wise man. In the above he hasn't disappointed me; he is speaking the truth. Abe Foxman and his bunch have done considerable harm to the American Jewish community because they present themselves as speaking for all Jews. I pray that each of Rabbi Lapin's three predictions come to pass, especially that of "unreligious people embracing Christianity."
13 posted on 02/13/2004 3:14:19 PM PST by waxhaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: franky
If it were not for the Jews, where would we gentiles be?

"Salvation is from the Jews." (Jn 4:22)

14 posted on 02/13/2004 5:41:28 PM PST by kosta50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
David Horowitz said it was the closest cinema can get to a religious experience. Matt Drudge called it a miracle. Deal Hudson said it brought high art back into the Catholic Church. Michael Novak said it was the most powerful film he had ever seen. Rush Limbaugh said he sat in stunned silence afterwards and couldn't move. Aint it Cool News gave it a five-minute standing ovation after a special screening. Cardinal Castrillon called it a masterpiece aesthetically and a brilliant work theologically. Billy Graham wept and said it was for him the closest thing to actually being at Calvary. The Pope--despite Vatican denials--said "It is as it was."

This is already the most talked-about and controversial film in history. Gibson had no idea his movie would raise such a ruckus. But as Jesus said, "If they persecute me, they will persecute you." Gibson, after all, was playing with fire, refusing to Hollywoodize his film as Jesus movies had done in the past by glamorizing the subject with angels singing in the background and a feminized Jesus dying gracefully and not a member of the Sanhedrin anywhere in sight. Gibson's film is gritty and masculine and theologically powerful. It tells the truth as the Gospels told it.

I for one don't doubt this downpour of grace is from God, coming at a time when our Christian roots are parched for rain. The enemies of Christianity know this. Look at the pattern of hostility against it, and take note of the unmotivated hatred and lies and venom it has already surmounted. All this because its director dared to take the Gospels seriously as authentic historical sources! Look at the trailers and be moved. Then buy some tickets.

15 posted on 02/14/2004 5:05:07 AM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
I can't wait to see this film. If it moves me half as much as the film "The Last Temptation of Christ" or 1/10th as much as the novel "The Last Temptation of Christ", I'll consider it to be a huge success.

It was so good, it took me 20 minutes to finish the last couple of pages of "Last Temptation" because I couldn't read through the tears that welled up and literally spilled out on to the pages of the book.

Nikos Kazantzakis's book dealt with Christ's internal conflict and internal conflict is extremely difficult to transfer from the page to the screen, but I think Scorsese did about as good a job as could be done. I'm glad I saw the film prior to reading the novel or I might have been very dissapointed.

16 posted on 02/14/2004 2:26:21 PM PST by getoffmylawn (Willie Harris and Jon Garland MUST step up their play)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: getoffmylawn
The opposition to the movie is promoting it. I am afraid that the message of the movie will fall victim to human passions.
17 posted on 02/14/2004 4:20:11 PM PST by kosta50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
All this because its director dared to take the Gospels seriously as authentic historical sources

They are not. They have been written at different times (last one, by John, some 60 years after Jesus' death). I don't know how much you remember what happened sixty years ago, but that's a long stretch for anyone's mind.

More importantly, there are no contemporary accounts to back them up. Please don't bring up Josephus and Titus! They are not contemporary accounts, but passing comments ex post facto. If Jesus were as popular as we are told in the Gospels, surely someone else besides His loyal disciples would have written something about Him, especially the pedantic Roman administrators.

One should not confuse the message of the Gospels with their authenticity as historical accounts.

18 posted on 02/14/2004 4:35:40 PM PST by kosta50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
I am afraid that the message of the movie will fall victim to human passions.

LOL!!!

19 posted on 02/14/2004 5:01:22 PM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
Yep, let's shrug off the dramatic changing of the course of history and human existence. From the face of civilization to how we record time itself.

Just a fluke because of an unpopular guy.

20 posted on 02/14/2004 5:12:06 PM PST by AAABEST (<a href="http://www.angelqueen.org">Traditional Catholicism is Back and Growing</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson