Replies

Dear PNAMBC,

You asked why (in a rather obnoxious manner) this data needed to be: 1. researched; 2. reported.

We answered. You didn't like the answers. That's fine.

But then you repeatedly asked the "why" question as if no one had provided you any answers. That was an unreasonable response.

If you were posting in charity, you would say to yourself, "Well, those reasons really don't cut it for me, but let me see if I can understand why they might work for these folks. Hmmm... they seem to be trying to work out the problems in their own church, and they think this helps them. I don't quite see it, but if they do, perhaps it is helping them."

And that would have been the end of your snide remarks.

But it was not. You continue to press for answers to questions which have been repeatedly answered. You reject the answers, but they have been provided.

I haven't called you any names, yet. I have stated that many of the things that you've said are part of anti-Catholic bigotry. It may be that you argue thusly out of ignorance, or out of misconceptions, or out of an inability to draw logical conclusions. I don't really know.

All you are to me are words over the Internet. I can only read the words. I can't read the intentions behind them. So, I'm careful to draw conclusions about intentions. Why you say what you say, I'll try not to guess.

But your initial posts, especially, closed the loop on the anti-Catholic attack on the Catholic Church. Why you have allowed yourself to be made part of that attack, I won't guess.

" THE RCC IS THE LARGEST.

"You stick your head above a crowd you're going to get shot at.

"WHINING about being singled out when you are forever pointing out about being the LARGEST, is just that, WHINING."

LOL. Telling comments. Not those of our friends.

sitetest