Actually, I never personally questioned your motives. What I did was point out the inconsistency of your logic whereby first you complain about Catholics presenting data comparing the problem of abuse among other segements of society and then you complain when Catholics DON'T present data comparing how that abuse was handled amongst other segments of society.
Such inconsistency tends to lead one to think you just want to complain rather than engage in serious dialogue and examination.
Can you see, now, how some could be led to this conclusion and would you like to actually continue with the discussion?