Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins; P-Marlowe
Thank you so much for the ping to this thread!

Here are the links to P-Marlowe's post and mine.

The summary of my view was as follows, though it doesn't make much sense unless attached to the previous article (LOL!):

The author does not define time and thus draws his conclusions hastily; since our physical vision and mind are "anthropomorphic" to space/time, it is reasonable to conclude that the Scriptures are also primarily anthropomorphic to space/time.

Thank you so much for all the encouragements on the previous thread! Hugs!

9 posted on 02/03/2004 10:24:26 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl; xzins; P-Marlowe
The author does not define time and thus draws his conclusions hastily; since our physical vision and mind are "anthropomorphic" to space/time, it is reasonable to conclude that the Scriptures are also primarily anthropomorphic to space/time.

Absolutely, Amen. It MUST be anthropomorphic since that relates to the Space, Time, Energy, Mass box aspect of reality. If it was not anthropomorphic (within the STEM box), we would not perceive the transcendent aspect of God, thus anything in the Bible, including the Incarnation, etc., would not be available to us.

10 posted on 02/03/2004 10:46:18 AM PST by Vernon (Sir "Ol Vern" aka Brother Maynard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson