To: xzins
***We are in a new era. A well-reasoned, non-flaming piece WOULD be read by me and probably others.***
This was not the answer you gave for not reading my posts in the past. They were simply too long. Or so you said.
***I think your knowledge of math and engineering(?) would be welcome in a discussion of time. Did you see Alamo-Girl's post on the other thread? Excellent.***
I have skimmed through them. But to be frank, my being an expert in certain things is irrevelant. The Omniscience of God is not "rocket science." It requires nothing more than a truth receptor in one's soul. See 1 Corinthians 2:14. There is a dangerous theme which plays out on these threads. Over and over, Arminians appeal to intelligence and scientific reasoning (please note that I'm not impeaching Alamo Girl) in the formulation and defense of their doctrines. We Calvinists come along with our Bible.
So, I am particularly uninterested in discussing "time" with you or anyone. If there is a disciple of Boyd here, I might be willing to show him/ her a thing or two about what the Scriptures really teach.
Woody.
16 posted on
02/03/2004 11:21:34 AM PST by
CCWoody
(Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory,...)
To: CCWoody; P-Marlowe
I don't know that there are any disciples of Boyd here. There might be, but they haven't announced themselves.
I understand you to say that you don't want to discuss these ideas with anyone who is not a disciple of Boyd.
Whatever my reasons for not reading your posts in the past, we've been told we're in a new era. I'm ok with that.
18 posted on
02/03/2004 11:29:56 AM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson