Skip to comments.
Open Theology: A Response to John Piper by Dr. Gregory Boyd
Biblical Theology ^
| Dr. Gregory Boyd
Posted on 02/03/2004 9:35:26 AM PST by xzins
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440, 441-454 last
To: nobdysfool
How am I limiting God? I'm stating self-evident fact.Just commenting on the way you stated fact. To say that God cannot do something seems bold. However, I also said...
By definition God cannot sin and I suppose that being unjust and unholy would be a sin so you might be correct.
441
posted on
02/06/2004 7:15:41 PM PST
by
PFKEY
To: CARepubGal
Is that what Jesus would do?
You had some very nice posts on the GOOD NEWS - BAD NEWS thread. I hope to see more like that.
442
posted on
02/07/2004 8:58:49 AM PST
by
White Mountain
(By their fruits ye shall know them.)
To: White Mountain; CARepubGal
Is that what Jesus would do?Interesting question.
If He were in the temple castising moneychangers, I bet He'd be very rough.
He's another question and answer.
What wouldn't Jesus be?
A mormon.
443
posted on
02/07/2004 9:21:21 AM PST
by
Wrigley
To: CARepubGal; Wrigley
What have I missed other than mormons and arminians bleeting?What wouldn't Jesus be?
A mormon.
You two knock off the insults.
To: Religion Mod
Honestly, what insults?
I contend, and always will contend that Jesus wasn't a mormon and there is no way he would ever be a mormon.
446
posted on
02/08/2004 3:04:48 AM PST
by
Wrigley
To: Wrigley
If you "honestly believed" that blacks were inferior to whites would you go around saying that to blacks?
I seriously doubt that Jesus would be Presbyterian, either, or Catholic, or Methodist, or whatever; it works the other way round.
So knock off the insults to Mormons, which would include refusing to capitalize their chosen name for themselves.
To: Religion Mod
Interesting response.
448
posted on
02/08/2004 5:20:13 AM PST
by
Wrigley
To: Wrigley
Interesting response.Meaning exactly what, Wrigley?
To: Religion Mod
Interesting, as in something to think about.
450
posted on
02/08/2004 5:23:49 AM PST
by
Wrigley
To: Religion Mod
Insults to whom? mormons? the bleating refers to sheep. Are sheep outlawed on the new religion forum now?
To: CARepubGal
Insults to whom? mormons? the bleating refers to sheep. Are sheep outlawed on the new religion forum now?You have the gall to ask that after saying this?
What have I missed other than mormons and arminians bleeting?
Take a little time off to think about it.
To: drstevej; xzins; P-Marlowe; Vernon; Corin Stormhands; Revelation 911; rwfromkansas
I thought Calvinists weren't interested in numbers.
453
posted on
02/08/2004 8:55:28 PM PST
by
connectthedots
(Recognize that not all Calvinists will be Christians in glory.)
To: connectthedots
BYE
454
posted on
02/08/2004 9:38:10 PM PST
by
drstevej
(THttABTSFitIotCRbtLaDJC)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440, 441-454 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson