Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: AAABEST
Dear AAABEST,

If you insist on posting substantive replies to my comments, your request that I "go away" is disingenuous.

You've posted falsely about me, and I'm responding.

"I'll tell everyone else that a self declared real Catholic approves only of us 'quietly assisting at masses'."

If you're referring to me as the "self declared real Catholic", you've falsified my view, though it should scarcely matter. Unlike the Successor of Peter, I enjoy no infallibility. ;-)

But, no, I don't approve of you quietly assisting at the Masses of the schismatics. But if you are in error, and nonetheless leave others in peace, committing your error quietly, it seems reasonable to leave you in peace.

But you commit your error, call that which is evil good, and proclaim it loudly, trying to persuade others to join you in it. Yet, you are so upset that any would resist your falsehoods and your blandishments.

It's really very amusing. You reserve to yourself the right to proselytize on behalf of your new-found false beliefs. You go around telling all of us, that you are going to boldly work on behalf of the SSPX. You assert things about Catholic faith, claiming them to be true. When others object, and show how you're wrong, you're quite offended!! We who disagree with you have no right to contradict you!!

* chuckle *

Now we know why you don't believe the pope is infallible. He's usurping YOUR authority!!! LOL. (That's a joke, John, take it in good spirit.)

If you're going to loudly proclaim falsehood, expect opposition.

"I find your whole 'I'm making all these accusations and condemnations because I care for you' gig beyond hilarious."

I'm glad to have entertained you. Perhaps I'm good for something. ;-)

"I can't even be angry about it it's so transparent and absurd."

I appreciate your indulgence, that you're not angry. But I note that while you characterize the intent and effect of what I've said, you haven't actually bothered to address the substance.

"What's worse is you may actually believe yourself."

Indeed, I do.

"Thank you for the conversation but are we done yet?"

We will be done with direct conversation when you no longer post to me substantively.

"Because I'm not interested in anything you have to teach me, disinfectants and all."

I didn't think you were.

"As requested, I've now officially asked you to go away."

No one is forcing you to continue the conversation, John.



sitetest
59 posted on 02/03/2004 8:50:58 AM PST by sitetest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest
YAAAWWWWNNN

Is that considered "substantive" or are we done now?

60 posted on 02/03/2004 8:59:28 AM PST by AAABEST (<a href="http://www.sspx.org">Traditional Catholicism is Back and Growing</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson