[madprof98]

Long ago, I subscribed to NCR and read it "religiously." It occurred to me that nobody in their right mind would belong to the Church described in the newspaper, so I got out. Years later, much humbled, I returned. But I resolved never to read the thing again, and I make an exception only for the articles posted here. As I recall, a year ago January somebody posted a piece from NCR which endorsed abortion. After that, I don't see how anyone could justify subscribing to it.

[heyheyhey]

As I recall, a year ago January somebody posted a piece from NCR which endorsed abortion.

I believe the NCR to be the most anti-Catholic publication. Good thing you got out, but there are still many church people under their influence.

The pro-abortion piece, and I know the NCR is "pro-," would be valuable for this thread.

[Notwithstanding]

NCR treats dogma as if it were fruitcake (pardon the term).

They don't really like it, so they pick out the bits they do like and try to pretend the whole cake is made up of just those bits - ignoring the reality that the bulk of the cake is actually something they do not like.

That is what NCR is all about - a big charade - a huge lie - a giant fantasy - that they keep pretending is a reality. Their psychology and philosophy classes taught them that there is no such thing as reality and so they (naturally) assume that they can create their own construct and pretend it is whatever they wish.