That's funny. Your organization never acknowledges blatant and consistent error. Again, holding others up to a different standard.
Context was provided for your statements. Your response to this initially was "It's not an inconsistancy, as stated.". Later, that turned to you claims of folks "slander[ing]", "attack[ing] me personally", etc., if memory serves. Claiming people are picking on you when you can't respond to the facts at hand is poor debating form.
Can you say "pot"? Can you say "kettle".
I'm not desperate to shut you up.
Yes you are.
I am concerned about souls and truth.
Your concerned about a religious institution.
Whatever your reason for apparently taking it personally, that's for you to hash out - not me. And no research required. I study Scripture and when I see someone write error or omit, they will be called on that. I'm sorry that makes you uncomfortable.
Why don't you ever study and recognize errors in your own religion? Seems hypocritical to me.
Lastly, you've been asked for your citations on this thread concerning the early fathers. The fact they were not provided speaks for itself. That's something that you've been called on in the past. If you want to tuck tail and skidaddle, that's your business. But at least folks will have it noted as such and note it's not the first time its' happened. ;)
You've been called on doctrine not backed up by scripture consistently. If you want to tuck and run fine. But at least folks will have it noted and heaven knows its not the first time its happened.
What is my "organization"?
Can you say "pot"? Can you say "kettle".
Can't argue the point I see.
Your concerned about a religious institution.
What is a my "religious institution"?
I guess you're either unable, or unwilling to speak to someone writing whatever they fancy in regards to what it takes in becoming a Christian, when it doesn't square with Scrupture. Your response? Doesn't even address the issue.
Why don't you ever study and recognize errors in your own religion? Seems hypocritical to me.
What is my "religion"?
I guess I could go back into the TNS threads and find where I did discuss and point out that some of what folks were saying, both in regards to what Chritsians were saying, and others.
I can't compel you to argue the merits. That's unfortunate, because we could have a good debate. Whatever. It ends up spinning into the old "you guys", and "them", and "they always...", etc., etc. That's usually what happens when folks tuck tail and skidaddle...