Havoc, you're in fine form! ;)
It's not an interpretation issue. It's about writing error and being called on that. Context was provided for your statements. Your response to this initially was "It's not an inconsistancy, as stated.". Later, that turned to you claims of folks "slander[ing]", "attack[ing] me personally", etc., if memory serves. Claiming people are picking on you when you can't respond to the facts at hand is poor debating form.
I'm not desperate to shut you up. I am concerned about souls and truth. Whatever your reason for apparently taking it personally, that's for you to hash out - not me. And no research required. I study Scripture and when I see someone write error or omit, they will be called on that. I'm sorry that makes you uncomfortable.
Lastly, you've been asked for your citations on this thread concerning the early fathers. The fact they were not provided speaks for itself. That's something that you've been called on in the past. If you want to tuck tail and skidaddle, that's your business. But at least folks will have it noted as such and note it's not the first time its' happened. ;)