To: P-Marlowe; Revelation 911; The Grammarian; SpookBrat; Dust in the Wind; maestro; patent; ...
The skeptic that emailed me stated, in effect, that if an all-powerful God did not eliminate evil, then He was a devil! The implication is that the removal of all evil would permit a better, more loving world. A truly loving God, the skeptics assert, would have desired and created such a world because it is clearly superior to the one we have. Any God that did not follow this logic was not a God of love, but an evil tyrant. As we have seen, this logic crumbles under its own weight. The existence of evil is the "side effect" of creating a world with love. But as we have seen, there are compelling arguments that a world possessing both evil and love is superior to a world where neither is possible. For God to eliminate evil, He would have to eliminate our capacity of choice and thus our capacity to do both evil and good. And such a world is inferior to the one we have: one where love is possible, despite its inherent evil. What kind of God would do this? Only one kind. A God of love.
Why does a God of love allow evil? Because He is a God of LOVE.
2 posted on
01/23/2004 5:42:15 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
To: Vernon; Revelation 911; The Grammarian; P-Marlowe; Corin Stormhands
You'll definitely like this article ping!
3 posted on
01/23/2004 5:43:10 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson