Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: polemikos
(A) The Papacy and the Magisterium don't rely on sola Scriptura and (B) the Papacy and the Magisterium don't lead to error, so I must confess I don't see your point.

And... the Bible does lead to error?

You've misunderstood my argument, and for that I apologize. It is not about people leaving, but about people misunderstanding.

Your clarification doesn't help your argument. Surely you must hold that Luther misunderstood, right? Well then.

923 posted on 01/25/2004 9:31:35 PM PST by A.J.Armitage (http://calvinist-libertarians.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 707 | View Replies ]


To: A.J.Armitage
And... the Bible does lead to error?

Now I didn't say that, now did I?

Surely you must hold that Luther misunderstood, right? Well then.

I can't read your mind. Misunderstood what? Sola Scriptura? Of course he misunderstood it. Luther, even though he was initially the leading proponent of the sola Scriptura doctrine, eventually concluded it was unworkable.

The Luther of 1521 refused to allow anyone on earth to point out to him the faith unless he himself could gather its truth from the Word of God.

But the Luther of 1535 says:
"The Word of God does not suffice as a regula fidei (rule of faith)... [an] authority is also needed to decide on questions of doctrine"
- Friedrich Paulsen, esteemed Protestant historian, quoted from his History of German Education, 4:485

930 posted on 01/25/2004 10:57:58 PM PST by polemikos ("To be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant" - John Henry Newman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 923 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson