Don't hope too hard, some things are getting a little obvious.
But a civil, cordial discussion of LDS beliefs - and only if you bring the subject up - will still involve pointing out problematic areas, such as the complete lack of archaeological evidence of any of the accounts in the Book of Mormon. And the DNA tests which show that native American Indians are descended from Chinese/Asiatic ancestors and not of semitic ones.
If the subject of inaccurate translations arises, we can discuss quite civilly the Book of Abraham.
All this should be done in the spirit of academic polite discussion for the edification of any that are interested in learning the facts about the subject, as I'm sure you'll agree. No personal attacks, just the facts, as the mods say.
Glad to read this there were also descends in Jerusalem of Chinese/Asiatic ancestors as well as Egyptian! Jerusalem was cosmopolitan!