respectfully WM, I've seen threads regarding the congressional testimony of Maj. Carleton regarding the infamous MMM last exactly 3 posts. The was no editiorializing nor comment - yet they got whacked
will these now be tolerated - or will pro-LDS be the only ones that survive?
Im frankly skeptical by whose measure we judge "false attacks"
That's a good question.
What I want to know is; what time of day did you register? I mean, just which one of us has seniority?
Maybe that is why I never saw them. But I have seen the MMM articles that the Washington Post and Salt Lake Tribune recycle every few months.
Funny thing is, the only MMM articles they ever print, so far as I know, and the only MMM articles I ever see here, uniformly try to pin the blame on Brigham Young, and by extension the LDS Church for having him as its leader. But never a word about Haun's Mill, or Governor Bogg's order, or Carthage, or the exodus from Nauvoo in the dead of winter, or the hardships of crossing the plains, or the trailside graves, or the difficulty of communication and travel in those days in the inter-mountain West which Brigham Young somehow miraculously overcomes.
Is there some agenda at work, such as to have our leaders permanently on trial? Why so one-sided?
I am here to discuss the Scriptures, not apologetics. People need to get the responses of our scholars and link to them as well, so people can compare and make up their minds. And then of course people need to behave, so the threads stay there.