Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ninenot
Concerning MLK, a thought occurred to me. I had always been somewhat ambivalent about the holiday controversy. Recalling all the arguments about whether or not he should be honored with a national and/or state holiday (this blew up in AZ over a decade ago), all the positives and negatives - and there were definite negatives (adultery) - how do you categorize the man?

The daily readings in the Church now come from the kingdom books and involve King David. A man after God's heart. A man who also committed an adulterous rape then murder.

"I would sin like David, if only I could repent like David"

11 posted on 01/21/2004 11:37:18 AM PST by TotusTuus (Psalm 51)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: TotusTuus
I categorize MLK as more positive than negative. He was also a plagiarist and (some say) a communist fellow-traveler.

OTOH, he was a non-violent guy, evidently learned in Scripture and understanding of Right Order.

All in all, a human being.
12 posted on 01/21/2004 11:56:28 AM PST by ninenot (So many cats, so few recipes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson