Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sandyeggo
I would have been behind Bush, and that, of course, was at odds with the Pope, not to mention CG and Chuck. Plus, it would mean agreeing with ultima. (the horror!) :)

I'm with you here. I think we have done a great thing in removing Saddam.

I also told him I have always wondered why we let Russia beat us to Berlin.

Because the split up of Germany and Austria had already been decided at Yalta and Tehran. The Russians were upset enough that we pushed to the Elbe (we later pulled back from Thurningia, western Bohemia, western Saxony). To have pushed to Berlin would have meant pushing to the Oder.

If we had been actually interested in capturing countries and preventing Soviet entry, we would have invaded the Balkans in 1943-1944 from Italy across the Adriatic to the Istrian peninsula (this was suggested but rejected for political reasons), and then driven to the Danube and up the valley into Hungary, Slovakia, and Silesia, followed up an invasion of France several months later after German forces had been drawn off to the new front. This was politically unacceptable to Roosevelt's Communist buddies in Washington and Moscow because it would have meant that all of central Europe south of the Carpathian mountains and the Oder River (everything except Poland, Pomerania, Prussia, and Moldavia) would have fallen to the US and Britain. Quite possibly, the US could have captured the territory up to the Vistula in the middle of Poland. The strategy would have been similar to Pacific campaign of island hopping. Rather than allowing the near trench warfare of Italy to bog the Army down - jump across the sea and around the Alps to avoid it and pin them down, captuing the Danube granary and the Ploesti and Austrian oil fields as a bonus to supply the advance.

147 posted on 01/23/2004 1:27:47 PM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: Hermann the Cherusker
I believe that General Patton started voicing concerns about what was happening with Russia and soon met his end in an automobile "accident". And wasn't Forrestal similarly concerned before he committed "suicide"?
148 posted on 01/23/2004 1:44:36 PM PST by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: sandyeggo; saradippity
For some perspective on invading the Balkans and preventing a Soviet capture of Europe, I went and got out my month-by-month battlefront atlas.

The Allies invaded Sicily in July 1943 and the Italian Boot in September of 1943. By the end of November, they had driven up against the first German fortifications - the Gustav line (roughly a line in front of Gaeta-Cassino-Ortona). At the same time, the Russians were on a line from the Dnieper to Leningrad.

In January of 1944, the Allies made an amphibious assault on Anzio from Naples, a distance of about 125 miles by sea. The comparable distance from Bari to the Albanian coast to strike through Kosovo and Nis to the Danube valley (Bucharest and Ploesti Oil fields) was also 125 miles, with a 400 mile inland drive needed to capture the source of Germany's oil. From Nis, one could also drive north to Belgrade (~150 miles) then Budapest (~250 miles).

An alternative assault on Istria to capture Fiume and Trieste, then drive to Zagreb, Vienna, and Budapest was a distance of 175 miles from the Italian coast up the Adriatic. This compares distancewise to a 200 mile assault made from Livorno to Marseilles and Toulon in August 1944.

Looking it over now, it would seem the assault from Bari was the most practicable in Janaury of 1944. The Soviets did not reach Romania until April 1944, with the taking of the county occuring in August and September of that year. A two prong Allied advance here in January would likely have met the Russians on the Siret and Pruth rivers in Moldavia in April of 1944 and advanced to the Carpathian mountains above Budapest to occupy the entire Hungarian basin by July of 1944, simultaenous with the great Russian advance on Minsk and Warsaw in June through August of 1944. The Allied line would run from Trieste to Ljubiana to Bratislava and along the Carpathians to the Black Sea. Simultaneous with a smaller landing in France or the Netherlands or Belgium, a large drive could then have been made across the lower part of the Carpathians to Silesia and Cracow then up the Oder to Berlin behind the main body of the German Army facing the Russians on a Riga-Warsaw line.

If the Allied drive was done right, Berlin would be captured before winter, and the war would be over, with all of Europe south and west of the Oder and Carpathians in free hands. That is, if the Allied attack had not provoked a more successful outcome to the July 1944 von Stauffenberg assassination attempt and a negotiated surrender to the Allies, with the Russians prevented from venturing beyond the Vistula into Prussia, annexed Poland (Wartheland) or historic Germany.

Of course, this is predicated on having a Commander In Chief interested in winning, rather than interested in serving Stalin.
151 posted on 01/23/2004 6:59:23 PM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson