To: sydney smith
Personal invectives aside, it's not my fault the relevant information was omitted from the initial article.
* It did not state that the teacher was a deacon.
* It did not state that the deacon had been installed by that bishop.
* It did not state that the deacon had been disciplined for inappropriate non-platonic relationship with the student in question.
* It did not include support for the supposition that the suicide was over the relationship with the student.
Pardon me if I insist on hearing a little evidence before hanging people. When the evidence was presented to me, I did already state that I agreed with the conclusion.
I recommend that you, in the future, wait until you review the evidence in question before you leap to your intemperate conclusions.
15 posted on
01/15/2004 9:09:54 PM PST by
dangus
To: dangus
>>* It did not state that the deacon had been disciplined for inappropriate non-platonic relationship with the student in question. >>
(It cited the students' belief that this is what happened. Given the events, the fact that students *presumed* this is what happened means little.)
16 posted on
01/15/2004 9:13:23 PM PST by
dangus
To: dangus; sydney smith
Pardon me if I insist on hearing a little evidence before hanging people.It's a little late too hang him, he's already taken care of it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson