[dangus]

Personal invectives aside, it's not my fault the relevant information was omitted from the initial article.

* It did not state that the teacher was a deacon.
* It did not state that the deacon had been installed by that bishop.
* It did not state that the deacon had been disciplined for inappropriate non-platonic relationship with the student in question.
* It did not include support for the supposition that the suicide was over the relationship with the student.

Pardon me if I insist on hearing a little evidence before hanging people. When the evidence was presented to me, I did already state that I agreed with the conclusion.

I recommend that you, in the future, wait until you review the evidence in question before you leap to your intemperate conclusions.

[dangus]

>>* It did not state that the deacon had been disciplined for inappropriate non-platonic relationship with the student in question. >>

(It cited the students' belief that this is what happened. Given the events, the fact that students *presumed* this is what happened means little.)

[Land of the Irish]

Pardon me if I insist on hearing a little evidence before hanging people.

It's a little late too hang him, he's already taken care of it.