Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: dsc
No, you are changing the conditions entirely

Changing the conditions would assume that you know what the conditions actually are to the exclusion of all others. This again is the point being made - that you don't know what the actual conditions are. You're stating your premise as support for itself, that is logically in error.

57 posted on 01/09/2004 4:57:29 AM PST by Havoc ("Alright; but, that only counts as one..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Havoc
"You're stating your premise as support for itself"

No such thing.

The manuscripts we have are in Greek. That identifies one language. There are two possibilities for another: Aramaic and Hebrew.

An expert can examine the Greek for indications that it is a translation from either language.

Your apparent aversion even to examining that possibility is hardly scientific.
59 posted on 01/09/2004 6:31:28 AM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson