To: dsc
No, you are changing the conditions entirely Changing the conditions would assume that you know what the conditions actually are to the exclusion of all others. This again is the point being made - that you don't know what the actual conditions are. You're stating your premise as support for itself, that is logically in error.
57 posted on
01/09/2004 4:57:29 AM PST by
Havoc
("Alright; but, that only counts as one..")
To: Havoc
"You're stating your premise as support for itself"
No such thing.
The manuscripts we have are in Greek. That identifies one language. There are two possibilities for another: Aramaic and Hebrew.
An expert can examine the Greek for indications that it is a translation from either language.
Your apparent aversion even to examining that possibility is hardly scientific.
59 posted on
01/09/2004 6:31:28 AM PST by
dsc
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson