Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: All
Havoc writes:

It's not an inconsistancy, as stated. And anyone who's read my comments on this issue knows that I hammer on repentance followed by compliance with Mark 16 requiring being born again and baptised in the Spirit, Romans 8 and John 10 - requiring being born again listening to and following in the Holy spirit AND the direction of the Apostles to reject anything which is different from the message they taught (requirement to know the scriptures). This is not new. It seems to step on your toes along with those of meny other sects; but, that's scripture.

They were your posts - your words that were posted and references to those posts were provided - much less wiggle room that way and sets the record straight for those who view the thread.

There are steps to becoming a Christian. You posted these steps - minus some. One of those steps is to confess and believe. Not just confess and not just believe. It's found in Scripture. The requirements as outlined by Scripture don't step on my toes, but what you posted (or rather, failed to post) is not what Scripture calls for and I will note that as such.

As I said before, you know this and you know your reputation from the Christian Chronicles threads. As per usual, you want to whine about the consequence of your behavior rather than behaving as a christian. That is your problem to solve, not mine. And your behavior is the reason you aren't directly speaking to me, or did you forget that part? I haven't.

Hmmm. I thought you were over that, as *you pinged me* on your reply. Guess not. Not sure what this has to do with souls and truth. - that's all of our concern. Whatever justifications you use for not getting it right in accordance with Scripture is for your and your ego to figure out.

110 posted on 01/16/2004 6:54:28 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: Fury
Well, it's refreshing to know that you guys still think you need to attack me personally when you can't defend any given topic. It's understandable too that you all seem to feel the need for this kind of damage control. Tell ya what, you just keep it up and I'll sit back and snicker for a while. What's that rule, attack the citations and impugne them, if that fails attack the person and impugne them, if that fails.... but never deal with the topic at hand if it paints you in a bad light.. lol. Have fun.
111 posted on 01/16/2004 7:24:23 AM PST by Havoc ("Alright; but, that only counts as one..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson