You'd be a good Amchurch cardinal.
Thanks. I think you'd be quite happy in my reign. I just thought your analogy didn't quite fit. You implied that the words had been changed to mean the exact opposite of what they did before. White, turning to black would sound like this: "....Which shall be shed for noone and for few unto the forgiveness of sins." Maybe you should not have said black and white but rather white and cameo, but with such little contrast you wouldn't get to delight in your indignation.
You'd be a good Amchurch cardinal.
And you make an extremely poor exegete of Romans 5.
Romans 5.15 But not as the offence, so also the gift. For if by the offence of one, many died: much more the grace of God and the gift, by the grace of one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.
"Many died" because of original sin? Not all?
16 And not as it was by one sin, so also is the gift. For judgment indeed was by one unto condemnation: but grace is of many offences unto justification.
17 For if by one man's offence death reigned through one; much more they who receive abundance of grace and of the gift and of justice shall reign in life through one, Jesus Christ.
18 Therefore, as by the offence of one, unto all men to condemnation: so also by the justice of one, unto all men to justification of life.
"unto all men justification"? Do you mean to tell me St. Paul is preaching universalism?
19 For as by the disobedience of one man, many were made sinners: so also by the obedience of one, many shall be made just.
"many were made sinners"? What, now we are back to large numbers of exemptions from the law of sin?
Your strict definitions of "all" and "many" would make a hash out of this passage, among others.
Want to try again Irish?