[jboot]

Hmmm, I'm one of those "Evangelical Non-Denominational Bible-Believing Born-Again" folks and I don't hold to pre-trib or pre-mil. For that matter, I'm not fully sold on Dispensationalism either. I guess the labels need better glue.

At any rate, the premise of the article seems to be "these people are dangerous to the Catholic Church" but it fails to prove any such thing. Does it matter what they believe, since they are not part of the RCC? Or is the real concern that the Catholic laity may begin to accept these doctrines? If that is the case, I'd worry a lot more about the "DaVinci Code", with 7 million copies sold and growing fast. At least "Left Behind" is free of any Gnostic heresy.

[Conservative til I die]

Or is the real concern that the Catholic laity may begin to accept these doctrines?

Of course that's the concern. It's not like it's some sort of secret that we view opposing, yet popular doctrines to be a danger to the Church. The Catholic Church doesn't exist in a vaccuum, and we are exposed everyday to gutter theology like the Rapture, the Prayer of Jabez, etc.