Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alex Murphy
I used that term in the context that you might know the story, but don't know how it applies to other discussions. And it looks like I was right.

No, I am just unable to follow all the perverse logic that some apply to Scripture and prefer to stand with our traditional understanding of the verses. It has served us well for almost 2000 years, after all.

I considered, and saw fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air.

Now, why was there a human body included among the beasts on the sheet...

I'm sorry, but the convolutions and deceit being used here are thankfully beyond me.

397 posted on 12/05/2003 7:13:48 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies ]


To: FormerLib
I'm sorry, but the convolutions and deceit being used here are thankfully beyond me.

Why don't we take this by the numbers, one at a time, since you admit interpreting scripture is "beyond you"

1) Was there a human body on the sheet in Acts 11?

398 posted on 12/05/2003 7:21:03 AM PST by Alex Murphy (Athanasius contra mundum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson