[FormerLib]

Please explain why you believe a human body was included, but not mentioned, on the sheet shown to Peter in Acts 11.

If anyone can let me know what this is supposed to mean, please let me know. LOL!.

We can begin talking about the validity of transubstantiation once you offer your reading of that chapter...

Ah, YOPIS again!

[Alex Murphy]

Me: Please explain why you believe a human body was included, but not mentioned, on the sheet shown to Peter in Acts 11.

You: If anyone can let me know what this is supposed to mean, please let me know. LOL!.

Hey ArrogantBustard - here's a prime example of the biblical illiteracy I was talking about, on our other thread. Maybe you can help this poor, misguided Catholic see the connection (at least from a Protestant POV) between Acts 11 and the doctrine of transubstantiation.

[conservonator]

Ah, YOPIS again!

Who needs Sacred Tradition when you have the all-powerful YOPOIS at your beck and call?

BTW, how many times have you been called a Catholic on this thread?:)