[OLD REGGIE]

You have no concept of what primacy is, or what it involves. It doesn't mean the right to appoint Bishops. The appointment of Bishops is a relatively modern thing (elections were the old method). But primacies have always been there.

I assure you I do know what primacy involves. That is why I have already posted that the Eastern Church accorded a Primacy of Honor to the Bishop of Rome.

It is the misuse of this meaning by some RC's on this thread that I am responding to. I admit I overstated several times with my bolded NO PRIMACY! in my response to Dave. He knows what I mean. It is a secret code. Sorry.

[SoothingDave]

That is why I have already posted that the Eastern Church accorded a Primacy of Honor to the Bishop of Rome.

One is either prime or not. This "honor" thing is Orthodox propaganda. The Pope is not the Queen of England, whose power is only titular.

SD