Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: OLD REGGIE
Don't be even more foolish than is necessary. The quoted material acknowledges the primacy of Rome. Even in the East. That the Pope never "approved" of the document doesn't make the attitude in the East different.

Whose side are you arguing?

SD

317 posted on 11/26/2003 9:04:00 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave
Don't be even more foolish than is necessary. The quoted material acknowledges the primacy of Rome. Even in the East. That the Pope never "approved" of the document doesn't make the attitude in the East different.

It recognized the primacy of the Bishop of Rome in the West!

Are you willing to claim that the Primacy of the Bishop of Alexandria, and other Eastern Bishops wasn't recognized also?
322 posted on 11/26/2003 10:20:39 AM PST by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN) Maybe a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson