Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Land of the Irish
How many "Catholics" in Massachusetts do you think, now, have no problem voting for Kerry (or Kennedy, as they have always done) as a result of his lack of leadership?

I would wager major coin that there would be a major backlash if the Archbishop of Boston endorsed or condemned a candidate. Catholics in Massachusetts would support Kerry even MORE.

That's why I hope O'Malley does not imitate Burke in denying the Eucharist to Kerry before the election; he would likely cause Bush to lose lots of votes in a backlash.

39 posted on 01/29/2004 9:05:35 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
Catholics in Massachusetts would support Kerry even MORE.

Here, I agree with you. "Catholics" in Massachusetts, for the most part, are not Catholic: e.g. St. Kennedy.

42 posted on 01/29/2004 9:17:49 PM PST by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Any "catholic" who votes for Kerry is hardly faithful. The ab should do his job and preach the truth no matter the election outcome.
49 posted on 01/30/2004 6:24:28 AM PST by johnb2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
That's why I hope O'Malley does not imitate Burke in denying the Eucharist to Kerry before the election; he would likely cause Bush to lose lots of votes in a backlash.

I am assumming Bishop O'Malley is more interested in saving souls rather than votes. If Kerry had an ounce of decency (which I doubt he has), he would not receive the Eucharist knowing his supports the murder of unborn children.

51 posted on 01/30/2004 6:49:46 AM PST by Gerish (Do not be fearful. God is with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
I forgot Deacon, you take the side of State over Church: small wonder that votes are more important to you than the Sacredness of the Holy Eucharist.
54 posted on 01/30/2004 7:19:26 AM PST by TradicalRC (While the wicked stand confounded, Call me, with thy saints surrounded. -The Boondock Saints)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Maybe there would be a "backlash;", maybe not.

The '60's liberals are no longer the majority--and are, in fact, a shrinking minority.

Younger voters are NOT abortion-happy as they once were.

Finally, since Mass. will NEVER be in the (R) column, who cares? O'Malley could slap Kerry real hard and it would make NO difference to Bush on the downside. It might, however, actually make an upside difference.

64 posted on 01/30/2004 9:50:46 AM PST by ninenot (So many cats, so few recipes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

You contradict yourself (more or less): You say in one post that the bishops should not endorse or criticize candidates because "that would cheapen their mission." Yet, when it comes to upholding the Church's teaching regarding sacrilegious reception of the Eucharist, you say they should take into account the fact that doing so could affect the election.

It is not a bishop's job to guess how his actions might affect an election. He should teach what the Church teaches, and enforce the Church's law, and let elections take care of themselves.

Our real problem is that we have some bishops who are honest-to-goodness atheists, and sought their positions entirely because it's the best way for them to exercise political influence. There are also many more who are Democrats first, and Catholic a distant second, third, or fourth.


80 posted on 07/07/2004 10:52:22 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

You contradict yourself (more or less): You say in one post that the bishops should not endorse or criticize candidates because "that would cheapen their mission." Yet, when it comes to upholding the Church's teaching regarding sacrilegious reception of the Eucharist, you say they should take into account the fact that doing so could affect the election.

It is not a bishop's job to guess how his actions might affect an election. He should teach what the Church teaches, and enforce the Church's law, and let elections take care of themselves.

Our real problem is that we have some bishops who are honest-to-goodness atheists, and sought their positions entirely because it's the best way for them to exercise political influence. There are also many more who are Democrats first, and Catholic a distant second, third, or fourth.


81 posted on 07/07/2004 10:52:31 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson