Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Pyro7480
But there's something in the back of my memory and I can't dredge it out, but some kind of doctrine group in your church decided that co-redemptrix wasn't official doctrine.

It went to the heart of the eucharist and transubstantiation, I think. Jesus was on the cross; it was Jesus' blood that was shed; redemption is in His blood and no other.

Something like that. They were concerned it somehow violated eucharistic teaching.
12 posted on 11/19/2003 1:37:30 PM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
Perhaps you should go back to the Jackson thread.
14 posted on 11/19/2003 1:46:05 PM PST by Codie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
The point of this discussion is not history, not verbage and not opinion.

The point is that by faith are we saved and the discussion should not even be had as the Church and its members live by faith. Faith in the Blessed Virgin Mother of Jesus, Mary, who was assumed into Heaven and sits with the Blessed Trinity.
16 posted on 11/19/2003 1:49:35 PM PST by franky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson