[Law]

I thought this thread was a discussion of Christian Reconstructionism.

You're mistaken. This thread was designed to be a hit piece on conservative Christians. That's why from the very beginning the main posters don't discuss the article's contents but rather attack Christians. Here's a typical early post that illustrates the case:

These loons are more dangerous than al Quaida because they are hiding in our own institutions.

We need to work on getting them to drink their own Kool-Aid, and soon.

It's only after attacks like this that Christians such as ckca return fire.

[Catspaw]

It's only after attacks like this that Christians such as ckca return fire.

By being rude, dragging arguments from other threads, personally attacking another freeper and telling me to get lost, and telling me that more than once? ckca's words went way beyond inappropriate into abusive.

[ckca]

You're mistaken. This thread was designed to be a hit piece on conservative Christians. That's why from the very beginning the main posters don't discuss the article's contents but rather attack Christians.

It's only after attacks like this that Christians such as ckca return fire.

Thank you. Too bad reason is wasted on these anti-Christian goons.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

Reminds me of last week's thread about some school district in NYC that endorsed displaying Red Crescents and Stars of David because they were "historical," but outlawed a Nativity scene, because it was "fictional."

It's always open-season on conservative Christians.