[Wrigley]

Im confused by your response to the above questions...this post does not seem like a slam to me.

Sure it was.

The RCs here on a continual basis slam Protestants for many things. They claim that there are thousands of different denominations, and that list is supposed to show how those denominations are divided. Contrast that to the one true unified rc church where everyone believes the same and they are the ones who are the true church.

There is the slam. Or the attempted slam.

Follow the context.

[OMalley]

I have been.

Are you denying that these differences do infact exist?

My suggestion was the questions be answered (by both Catholics and Protestents), but so far noone has been willing to do so.

Im sincerely interested since as a former protestent I was told many thing and many different theologies, each one claiming the "divine way".

There are many ppl searching on the other end, not just us that post and debate, it would be helpful i think to answer such questions.

Well tonight is the first friday night that my house has not been Abuzz with half the nieghborhood children. going to relax and enjoy and evening with the hubby:)

Happy debating everyone,
Blessings,
O'Malley

[dangus]

>>>>Im confused by your response to the above questions...this post does not seem like a slam to me.

>>Sure it was.

>>The RCs here on a continual basis slam Protestants for many things. They claim that there are thousands of different denominations, and that list is supposed to show how those denominations are divided. Contrast that to the one true unified rc church where everyone believes the same and they are the ones who are the true church.

>>There is the slam. Or the attempted slam.

>>Follow the context.

No, my post #12 was a slam. My post #7 was not a slam. It was a demonstration of a very valid logical point. Or does anything which contradicts your doctrine constitute a "slam"?