[Dr Warmoose]

This is called a "red herring", because the God haters want you to ignore the retrograde planets, the galaxies that do not appear their alleged age, the massive amounts of matter that BB predicts but no one can find... the list goes on.

These dolts confuse "interpretations of evidence" as "proof".

[dangus]

The Big Bang theory does not predict massive amounts of dark matter. That is the theory of one person who is a god-hater, Steven Hawkins, who has discarded the Big Bang precisely because it does point towards a singular First Thing (i.e.. God).

[dangus]

>>God haters want you to ignore the retrograde planets,>>

Retrograde planets? What do you mean? To me, "retrograde planets" has meant the unique backwards motion that planets make across the sky which enabled Copernicus to deduce that the Sun was the center of the solar system.

[dangus]

>> These dolts confuse "interpretations of evidence" as "proof". >>

No, it is physical evidence which is consistent with predictions made by theory. Absolute proof? No, but it is strong empirical support. Suppose someone claims to have seen a crime. He tells the police where to find the body. The police go there and find a body. Does that prove he witnessed the crime? No. But it sure helps make the case/