Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
"There are no transitional forms." FALSE.

If that is the case, please identify even one. I suggest you not go down that road because if you do, I will make you look really stupid.

9 posted on 11/05/2003 9:24:11 AM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: connectthedots; VadeRetro
What do the scientists in evolution consider transitional forms? Isn't it true not even one skeleton of a something morphing into another something has never been found?
13 posted on 11/05/2003 2:33:18 PM PST by Markofhumanfeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: connectthedots
I suggest you not go down that road because if you do, I will make you look really stupid.

Archaeopteryx. Take your best shot.

53 posted on 11/05/2003 7:59:55 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: connectthedots
I suggest you not go down that road because if you do, I will make you look really stupid.

Aw, man, I missed the gauntlet. But post 15 has been sitting there all night and all you did is ask if I thought it was evidence.

Maybe tomorrow you can make me look stupid, but I'm not staying up tonight.

54 posted on 11/05/2003 8:05:51 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson