>>That isn't the point.
WHOOPS! Doarn right it isn't the point. *sheepish* Wrong guy... I had Liberius in my head.
This is cool: THE SUPPOSED FALL OF HONORIUS AND HIS CONDEMNATION
(
http://www.mwt.net/~lnpalm/honrius1.htm) It claims, among much else, that while Honorius was condemned for failing to correct Sergiusm he did declared that no-one should affirm whether there were one or two natures; he did not incorrectly affirm either, so there was no false statement by him.
That's the most screwed up writing I ever committed... Giving up for the day.