To: Lazamataz
As you can imagine, we are rapidly approaching that point in time where we start moving our pilots into bunkers in order to destroy targets remotely, as the computers are quite capable of flying the actual vehicle itself into harms way.
13 posted on
10/12/2003 11:49:14 AM PDT by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
Artificial Intelligence and the Geneva Convetion will soon meet head to head (if they haven't already)
16 posted on
10/12/2003 11:51:56 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(Socialism is Slavery)
To: Southack
...as the computers are quite capable of flying the actual vehicle itself into harms way. It would also seem that the computers are capable of flying the plane out of harms way to some degree as well. "I'm sorry, Dave, but I'm afraid I can't do that."
22 posted on
10/12/2003 12:05:42 PM PDT by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
To: Southack
"starts him into an inverted, rolling spiral
towards the ground." Inverted spins are particularly nasty--used to be almost invariably fatal to the craft and/or the pilot. It's a great testament to both craft and pilot that this F/A-22 survived.
The new French Airbus puts computers between the pilot's yoke and the control surfaces to prevent him from doing things that could harm the aircraft or the passengers. Pilots generally don't like it--it feels mushy. And there's always the issue of a programming glitch in the software that prevents you from executing the one life-saving manuveur in a highly unusual situation.
27 posted on
10/12/2003 12:13:05 PM PDT by
DJtex
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson