Posted on 10/12/2003 8:51:02 AM PDT by jimkress
Edited on 05/07/2004 7:09:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Municipalities are rushing to file lawsuits against manufacturers of a gasoline additive that they say has polluted their water supplies.
The hurry is intended to beat a provision in the impending energy bill that would ban such legal challenges.
But the lawsuits simply aren't fair.
(Excerpt) Read more at detnews.com ...
A working definition of instnity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
Given their desperate, obsessive, repeatedly failing attmepts to impose command and control, the Left is obviously insane.
Also,
They should ask Washington to help defray their cost of clean-up and to scrap the program to prevent additional pollution.
No. We should insist Washington go back to the limited government the Founders gave us and stop trying to emulate Stalin and the Soviet Union.
![]() |
Or mail checks to or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com |
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER and say THANKS to Jim Robinson! |
|
In California, Governor Wilson started the mess and received large contributions from the oil companies. Then Davis came in and pledged to stop the additive in the gasoline in California. A few large contributions later and Davis moved out the date to stop the additive's use to a point where it still has not happened. Come next month California will have a new governor, what will Arnold do?
As to suing the oil companies, they will hide behind governments protection, but they did receive large economic benefits and it would not be out of order to ask them to help in the clean up. We like our corporations to be good corporate citizens.
where would the $$$ come from??? silly taxpayers...
kalifornica's senator richard mountjoy, along with talkradio host george putnam; n his listeners; called, emailed, n mailed sacremento....
the demonRATS didn't listen:
we have crappier air,
worse fuel mileage,
more car fires,
n now, contaminated ground water...
It is the leaky, underground storage tank that is/was the problem. It would be the owners/operators of these tanks as well as the regulatory agencys that has jurisdiction on inspection and permitting that have caused this. There are many, many water soluble chemicals stored underground without a problem.
I am under the impression that the magnitude of the mtbe contamination varies from local to local based how well these tanks were inspected. I recall that at the time there were many mom & pop convenience stores in Texas that discontinued their gasoline operations due to the condition of their tanks and the cost of replacing them.
It doesn't make any difference to the leaky tank.
But that's a GOOD thing! It could also be the start of a new industry - "spring fed" light beer.
Should you have later info on this, let me know.
I followed your link and I need to tell you that Bill Moyers is dishonest.
There is no such thing as a "Secret Tribunal". It is a 3 member arbitration panel with each side picking one member, and negotiating the third member. The findings are signed by each arbitrer. They even have a website.
Chapter 11 is the investor protections in NAFTA, which is a Investor-State trade agreement.
For a keener understanding of the implications, see Greider's The Right and US Trade Law: Invalidating the 20th Century.
After reading this you will understand why Hillary pronounced the Federalist Society as the prime mover behind the VRWC and how they are trying to roll back the New Deal. You will also understand why the Senate Democrats will do anything to keep Bush's Federalist Society judicial nominees off the bench.
As bad as the dems fear NAFTA Chapter 11, they are more fearful that the language will find its way into FTAA. After the recent passage of the Singapore and Chile FTAS, it was announced by Hoffa, AFL-CIO, and all the leftest NGOs that those trade agreements have the investor protections.
The tank owners did pay a price. Their stations' land lost value, but when the MTBE leaks into the ground water system it closes down wells along its path. So far, they have not been able to sue the station owners, the normal ground clean up was usually enough to drive them out of business. So who has the next in line deep pockets?
EXACTLY. Big Oil used MTBE rather than Ethanol because they controled the MTBE's.
Congress amended the Clean Air Act in 1990 with the aim of reducing tail pipe emissions from cars and directed the petroleum industry to reformulate its gasoline by adding one of two oxygenating agents, ethanol or MTBE.
These companies had a choice. They argued against the use of Ethanol. They lobbied against the use of Ethanol.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.