Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tighter Border Yields Odd Result: More Illegals Stay
The Wall Street Journal ^ | As of Friday, October 10, 2003 | EDUARDO PORTER

Posted on 10/12/2003 6:33:57 AM PDT by tomball

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:50:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

STOCKTON, Calif. -- Something unusual is happening among the illegal immigrants who work in the lush fields of the San Joaquin Valley. Instead of leaving after the harvest, as they did for years, they are staying here, settling into lives of poverty and putting new strains on the city.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: illegalimmigrants; immigrantlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: dano1
Agree. Babies of women illegally in the U.S. should not receive U.S. citizenship.

The only way this will happen is the repeal of the 14th Amedment. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside...."

Intended to give citizenship to ex-slaves, has outlived its usefulness in the present form. Should only require a small change, like adding the requirement of citizenship of a parent prior to the birth.

21 posted on 10/12/2003 8:40:48 AM PDT by onceone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: winodog
I stand corrected. I actually knew that from watching the show. The main poing being that it looked a slow and very painful death.
When they finally start eating you I would imagine you will be wishing you had not abused children
22 posted on 10/12/2003 8:45:53 AM PDT by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tomball
"Round 'em up, move 'em out...Rawhide!!"
23 posted on 10/12/2003 8:51:17 AM PDT by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton
Mr. Silverio ran a stop sign and hit another car. He was fined and still owes thousands of dollars to the other driver's insurance company. But before paying his debt, he went to a used-car lot and bought another vehicle, a 1994 Nissan.

But even a drunk driving accident with no insurance and a life on welfare with no bills ever being paid doesn't get this clown deported.

24 posted on 10/12/2003 9:11:53 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
Right now, if a charismatic conservative would step forward with the original party message of a smaller government, enforcing the laws of the nation, and returning to the use of the Constitution as the standard for judging new laws, this person would kick GW's butt.

I think the time is ripe for a real conservative to enter the Republican primary (will we even have one in 2004?)

25 posted on 10/12/2003 9:12:27 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer === (Finally employed again! Whoopie))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tomball
That's worth a chuckle.

Pitchforks are for farmin', folks.
26 posted on 10/12/2003 9:34:03 AM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
"Round them all up and ship them home."

Better yet would be to give them each $500 and a bus ride to Crawford, Texas. Perhaps even a dullard [a euphemism for "idiot"]like Bush would see the light when his neighbors felt the heat.
27 posted on 10/12/2003 9:43:28 AM PDT by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dano1; FITZ
End the anchor baby program .......

Agree. Babies of women illegally in the U.S. should not receive U.S. citizenship.

I agree that stricter standards for U.S. citizenship should be in place. However, changing the citizenship status for "anchor babies" would require changing this:

Amendment XIV

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States .....

28 posted on 10/12/2003 9:56:00 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
It looks like this criminal was convicted of all of the following, and is an illegal alien, but still wasn't deported. What gives?

(1) driving under the influence of alcohol (is this a felony?)
(2) driving without license to do so (Can't he get a Mexican license, which would be valid in the US?)
(3) wrekless driving
(4) disregarding stop sign
(5) causing a traffic accident
(6) driving without insurance

And, who will sell this guy a car when he doesn't have a license to drive it? Any clues? Isn't that illegal in itself?
29 posted on 10/12/2003 10:06:45 AM PDT by dufekin (Yassir Arafat? He's a terrorist ringleader extraordinaire. He's "wanted dead or alive"--and now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tomball
If they all stay in one area it would be easier to collect them for deportation.
Keep illegals out. Return the ones we have.
Keep the borders strong.
Is this a difficult concept?
30 posted on 10/12/2003 10:12:32 AM PDT by OldEagle (Haven't been wrong since 1947.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomball
Several good points made here. I also think we need to put some intense heat on DHS Secretary Tom Ridge to close the borders. Without control of the borders, the Dept. of Homeland Security is just another government fraud.

Once we control the borders, then we need to start making sweeps of illegals and tossing their butts out. If they don't have a fundamental respect for our borders, how can we expect them to respect our laws?

All of the INS hearings and other bureaucratic BS that takes place before an illegal immigrant can be deported is more government mumbo-jumbo. Catch'em and send'em back, no questions asked, no answers taken. Catch'em again and put them in a prison (reopen Alcatraz, for example) fro no less than 10 years, THEN toss their butts back across the border. Catch'em a third time and it's automatic death by firing squad, no appeals.

We are the only nation in the world with such porous borders and such lip service paid to their control. I think it's time to start lighting fires under Bush and Ridge to close them NOW and let Vicente Fox go cry himself to sleep at night!!!!
31 posted on 10/12/2003 10:18:49 AM PDT by DustyMoment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
The only way to secure the borders is not through militiarization, it's to secure the American interior, and that can only happen with apprehensions and deportations of long-time Illegals there.

Yeah! National ID cards and databases! Even more paperwork requirements to land a minimum wage job! Woo hoo!
32 posted on 10/12/2003 10:24:29 AM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2

Yeah! National ID cards and databases! Even more paperwork requirements to land a minimum wage job! Woo hoo!

That's silly and alarmist. It's nothing to set up sting operations at "day laborer" sites. It's nothing to pick up folks using false Social Security numbers at their places of emploment.

It's nothing to seek out Illegals using matricula consular ID cards.

It's also nothing, and no infringement on the liberties of any citizen or legal resident, to set up a mug shot and fingerprint database for the hundreds of thousands of Illegals that are apprehended every year. Later, if those prints show up on some Illegal with false papers, they can be ID'd through the database on Illegals.

Finally, it's nothing to declare that all Illegals will never be permitted to obtain guest worker status, or permanent residency. One strike and they're gone.


33 posted on 10/12/2003 11:08:56 AM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
I think the time is ripe for a real conservative to enter the Republican primary (will we even have one in 2004?)

This is madness.Putting a conservative up against "W" will only split the vote and hand the presidency to Hitlery or Dean or Clark.Now in 08 that's a different story depending on the economy and the war there may be an oportunity to put a real conservative on the ballot.
34 posted on 10/12/2003 11:55:11 AM PDT by edchambers (Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tomball
What kills me is that this reporter can manage to find plenty of admitted illegals to interview but he can't or won't turn them in to the Border Patrol.It's like these reporters that keep interviewing members of Hamas OK fine get the interview but tip off the IDF so they can blow them up after you've got your "exclusive".
35 posted on 10/12/2003 11:59:48 AM PDT by edchambers (Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone
What an odd position. Seems pretty obvious that the solution to the 'conundrum' is not only tighter borders, but to also do a little bit inside the country, say maybe, have police who identify illegal aliens in the course of regular operations turn the information, if not the people, over to the INS.

That's what I was thinking. If they become a static population then it is easier to identify and deport them. Maybe the border tightening is working better than it appears.

36 posted on 10/12/2003 12:10:41 PM PDT by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bjcintennessee
Read later.
37 posted on 10/12/2003 12:15:56 PM PDT by bjcintennessee (Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Bump
38 posted on 10/12/2003 12:48:17 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

Illegal Alien
39 posted on 10/12/2003 2:25:50 PM PDT by GeronL (Please visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edchambers
Join the Free State Party!! I want to have a party, so I am starting one =o)
40 posted on 10/12/2003 2:31:39 PM PDT by GeronL (Please visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson