Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush reportedly unhappy with Rumsfeld
Knight Ridder via Taiwan Times via The Agonist ^ | October 11, 2003 | staff

Posted on 10/11/2003 7:53:41 AM PDT by liberallarry

Taiwan News

2003-10-11 / Knight Ridder /

U.S.President Bush's overhaul of his top Iraq strategists reflects deep unhappiness with his national security team - particularly Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld but also Secretary of State Powell, Bush sources told the New York Daily News Thursday.

Bush's displeasure means that neither Powell nor Rumsfeld will keep his job in a second Bush term, the sources said. Powell already has signaled his intent to leave after the 2004 election but Rumsfeld had indicated he wanted to stay on.

"All this does is validate (Bush's belief that) it's time for new blood in a new administration if we're reelected," one official said. "There will be a changeover at Defense and a changeover at State."

Despite official White House denials, Bush's creation of an interagency Iraq Stabilization Group headed by national security adviser Condoleezza Rice is designed in part to halt the intramural turf battles between the Pentagon and State - infighting Bush believes has contributed to flagging public support for the war and its aftermath.

Much of Bush's disappointment is directed at Rumsfeld, who is widely seen within the administration to have been more adept at waging war than peace in Iraq.

"The president feels let down,"one well-placed source told the Daily News. "He feels as if Rumsfeld was unwilling to come and get help (for the postwar effort) and thinks his inability to trust anyone other than his immediate subordinates created a serious, ongoing problem in both Afghanistan and Iraq."

Moreover, the source added, "After the war, Rumsfeld wanted to get back to (Pentagon) modernization and transformation and took his eye off the ball."

But the secretary of state comes in for his share of criticism as well.

"Powell has basically absented himself from this situation because he wanted Rumsfeld to fail - and believe me, the president's unhappy about that, too."

The White House did not respond to calls seeking comment. Earlier this week, press secretary Scott McClellan told reporters that Bush has full confidence in Rumsfeld and other members of his foreign policy team.

Though Bush is aware that some of his senior advisers believe Rice has failed to control the warfare between Rumsfeld and Powell, there's no evidence Bush is upset with her. Rice has the closest personal relationship of any staffer with Bush - who has told friends for more than a year that he intends to appoint her the next secretary of state.

"She emerges as the winner," one top Bush adviser said Thursday.

http://www.etaiwannews.com/World/2003/10/11/1065838658.htm


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushhaters; disarray; iraq; knightridder; rumors; rumsfeld; speculation; turass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
If true, this is terrible news. The country cannot afford to lose in Iraq. On a partisan level Bush will never survive the departure of Powell and the dismissal of Rumsfeld.
1 posted on 10/11/2003 7:53:41 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
This is from Taiwan News? Who are they?
2 posted on 10/11/2003 7:55:50 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

God Bless America!
God Bless This Man!

Keep Our Republic Free

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
AND SAY THANKS TO JIM ROBINSON!
It is in the breaking news sidebar!



3 posted on 10/11/2003 7:55:53 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: liberallarry
Are you sure about this?
5 posted on 10/11/2003 7:58:19 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
this is liberal pap.....fact !!!!!!!!!
6 posted on 10/11/2003 7:59:37 AM PDT by cars for sale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
"one well-placed source " oh LOL!- can't even cite an admin official!

"Wasted away again in liberalfantasyville...
Searching for some thing wrong at the top.
I guess I'll claim Bush says Rummy's to blame,
But I can't, even claim an admin source. "

7 posted on 10/11/2003 8:02:30 AM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
Author is suffering from RCS - Rita Cosby Syndrome.
8 posted on 10/11/2003 8:05:50 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
If true, this is terrible news.

Outrageous... simply OUTRAGEOUS!

9 posted on 10/11/2003 8:08:09 AM PDT by johnny7 (... and dastardly too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
They got their stuff from Knight-Ridder. I couldn't get to them directly but the URL of the Taiwan news article is posted at the bottom of the article. Perhaps you can get through later and trace it down.
10 posted on 10/11/2003 8:09:17 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Nope. Neither are they. I hope it's not true.
11 posted on 10/11/2003 8:10:01 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Knight Ridder via Taiwan Times via The Agonist...

I'm told these are very reliabile, unbiased sources. </sarcasm>
12 posted on 10/11/2003 8:11:26 AM PDT by oh8eleven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Let's see are these the same sources that say that Cheney will not be Bush's running mate in '04?

I don't believe anything unless I hear it from the President's mouth.

How many times have we jumped to conclusions about what the President feels about the Israeli's actions, or domestic issues like stem cell research.

When he says what he believes, then I'll know that's what he believes. Until then, all these articles are just background noise.

13 posted on 10/11/2003 8:14:42 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
Taiwan Times is a reasonably good paper in Taipei.

It takes a ton of self-confidence to be such a desperately needed strong leader. And the hazard is that such people believe their own press reports and behave accordingly.

Let us pray for Bush and Condi all the more!
14 posted on 10/11/2003 8:15:13 AM PDT by Quix (DEFEAT her unroyal lowness, her hideous heinous Bwitch Shrillery Antoinette de Fosterizer de MarxNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
Knight Ridder via Taiwan Times via Agonist? Does that make it literally 4th hand?

I think there were 5 unnamed sources - how many "officials say" or "top advisors note" are required to give credibility to this latest Rumsfeld / Bush Bashing?
15 posted on 10/11/2003 8:15:56 AM PDT by Let's Roll (And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven
Don't be foolish.

The Agonist is partisan but they're quoting from two other sources. I'm willing to bet you know nothing of the Taiwan Times...and Knight-Ridder is not known for liberal bias.

16 posted on 10/11/2003 8:16:16 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Given the egos, values, personality traits involved, it's plausible. Whether it's true or not--it's VERY plausible.

Very sad, if true.
17 posted on 10/11/2003 8:16:42 AM PDT by Quix (DEFEAT her unroyal lowness, her hideous heinous Bwitch Shrillery Antoinette de Fosterizer de MarxNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: liberallarry
Knight-Ridder is not known for liberal bias.
I beg to differ, but without evidence at my finger tips I shall withhold flames...for now.
19 posted on 10/11/2003 8:21:19 AM PDT by oh8eleven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Let's Roll
I think there were 5 unnamed sources - how many "officials say" or "top advisors note" are required to give credibility to this latest Rumsfeld / Bush Bashing?

Here's a good theme for Rush, Hannity to hammer for a few months. If there "ain't no named sources....it ain't news." By now the press has lost so much credibility that people would be open to recognizing these 'unnamed sources' as pure fiction to justify the left's pounding of the right as "news".

20 posted on 10/11/2003 8:22:42 AM PDT by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson