Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When War Fails, Launch a PR Campaign
Scripps Howard News Service ^ | 10-10-03

Posted on 10/10/2003 5:18:28 PM PDT by Brian S

By BILL STRAUB Scripps Howard News Service Oct 10, 2003, 05:23

The Bush administration is undertaking a campaign to regenerate public support for its policies in Iraq, dispatching officials across the country to promote White House strategy and build momentum for its $87 billion proposal to rebuild the war-torn nation. In Portsmouth, N.H., on Thursday, President Bush praised military reservists and family members who gathered for his speech, asserting that the United States is "meeting the test of history" as a result of its involvement in Iraq, which he described as the "central front" in the war on terrorism.

"America cannot retreat from our responsibilities and hope for the best," Bush said during his visit to the Pease Air National Guard Base. "Our security will not be gained by timid measures. Our security requires constant vigilance and decisive action. I believe America has only one option _ we must fight this war until the work is done."

Bush was not the first White House representative to venture out this week to tout the administration's Iraqi policies, which recently have been criticized on both sides of the political aisle.

National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice told the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations on Wednesday that a recent update by chief U.S. weapons inspector David Kay justified the effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power.

"We now have hard evidence of facts that no one should ever have doubted," she said. "Right up until the end, Saddam Hussein continued to torture and oppress the Iraqi people. Right up until the end, Saddam Hussein lied to the Security Council. And let there be no mistake _ right up until the end, Saddam Hussein continued to harbor ambitions to threaten the world with weapons of mass destruction and to hide his illegal weapons programs."

The coordinated effort continues on Friday when Vice President Dick Cheney is scheduled to deliver remarks on Iraq and the war on terror to The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank in Washington.

The White House offensive arrives at a point when polls indicate that the American public's patience with rebuilding Iraq is waning. The frustration centers not only on the $87 billion price tag, which has generated strong negative reactions, but also on the continuing reports of American servicemen losing their lives long after the hostilities were thought to be over.

Scott McClellan, the president's press secretary, said the United States is "making progress on a number of fronts" in Iraq and that the administration feels it is "an important responsibility to let the American people know what we're doing."

U.S. military efforts are "accelerating" in Iraq at this time, McClellan said, and Bush considers it an appropriate time to explain "why he's optimistic about the direction we're headed." The administration also is aware, he said, that Congress is in the midst of considering the $87 billion request.

Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota said Thursday that "it's going to take more than a speech" for the president to begin generating support for his Iraqi policy and that the president must "consider serious changes in policy."

"I don't think the American people want spin," he said. "I think they want results. The only way we can get results is for the administration to change the path it has taken since the very beginning."

That includes, Daschle said, making concessions to bring other nations into the process and turning authority over to the Iraqi governing council at a quicker pace.

In Portsmouth, Bush said the situation in Iraq is "a lot better than you probably think." Stories told by individuals returning from Baghdad "are much different from the perceptions that you're being told life is like."

"You see, we're providing this help not only because we've got good hearts but because our vision is clear _ a stable and democratic and hopeful Iraq will no longer be a breeding ground for terror, tyranny and aggression," he said.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 10/10/2003 5:18:28 PM PDT by Brian S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian S

When the media is based, go straight to the people


2 posted on 10/10/2003 5:20:28 PM PDT by GeronL (Please visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
bttt
3 posted on 10/10/2003 5:21:29 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
EXACTLY, When the media refuses to tell the truth, then it's time to go around them and go directly to the people
4 posted on 10/10/2003 5:22:27 PM PDT by MJY1288 (This is your tagline "Bush/Cheney04", this is your tagline on drugs "AnyOtherChoice/04")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Aww man! Enough of the fundraiser posts!!!
Only YOU can make fundraiser posts go away. Please contribute!

5 posted on 10/10/2003 5:22:35 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
An entirely average axample of biased "journalism". Gets a bit out of hand at the end, with daschle's statement that other nations must be brought in. I seem to remember some activity at the u.n. to do that, but the "reporter" seems to be ignorant of that.
6 posted on 10/10/2003 5:31:10 PM PDT by Bud Bundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
As far as I am concerned, my life is worth 87 Billion dollars. Do you think Bill Gates (estimated at times to be worth 100 Billion) would rather be dead than give up his 100 Bil?

Sorry, but 87 Billion seems like a drop in the bucket to me. We are talking about future generations, and a Pax Americana.

The Social Marxists only care about costs when it is contrary to their screwy agendas.

7 posted on 10/10/2003 5:34:18 PM PDT by Radix (I am still working on the perfect Tag Line, this one here is just a prototype.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S; Doug Thompson; aculeus; general_re; BlueLancer; William McKinley; Poohbah; ...
When War Fails, Launch a PR Campaign

False and stupid headline from Capitol Hill Blue. Try,

Bush administration hoping to bolster support for Iraq

8 posted on 10/10/2003 5:35:00 PM PDT by dighton (Nasty Little Clique™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Brian S
When War Fails is filtered through the liberal press and turned into left wing propaganda, Launch a PR Campaign

It's about time. I know the Bush administration has been busy, though. They have a lot of Clinton land mines to defuse yet. It's gonna take a while.

10 posted on 10/10/2003 5:37:49 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Daschle said,

Like THAT should matter? Dashole? Gimmie a break!

11 posted on 10/10/2003 5:45:33 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Speeches by Bush, Rice and Cheney is considered an "offensive"?

Don't these 3 give speeches practically every day of their lives?

12 posted on 10/10/2003 5:46:41 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
...President Bush praised military reservists and family members who gathered for his speech, asserting that the United States is "meeting the test of history" as a result of its involvement in Iraq, which he described as the "central front" in the war on terrorism.

And, of course, the battle-front fighting against the traitors in the media continues here at home...

13 posted on 10/10/2003 5:50:17 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton; Doug Thompson
Looks like Doug Thompson is at it again, I think I'll go see if Bill Straub approves of 3rd rate news outlets altering the title's of his work
14 posted on 10/10/2003 5:54:19 PM PDT by MJY1288 (This is your tagline "Bush/Cheney04", this is your tagline on drugs "AnyOtherChoice/04")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dighton
I emailed Bill Straub, I'll let you know if he responds
15 posted on 10/10/2003 6:04:47 PM PDT by MJY1288 (This is your tagline "Bush/Cheney04", this is your tagline on drugs "AnyOtherChoice/04")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
"When the media refuses to tell the truth, then it's time to go around them and go directly to the people."

Exactly. And? Go on the offensive as soon as possible. Remind people that the California recall was a historic event in California history, that it represents a referendum on 30 years of failed liberal policies.

Repeat as necessary!

16 posted on 10/10/2003 6:12:33 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
Paging Rove!
17 posted on 10/10/2003 6:13:34 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
I could be mistaken but it seems that when a story is released for distribution, most likely for compensation, that the outlet paying for the privilege retains the right to title the article as they see fit.

The only reason I believe this is because I see countless articles from the same author with a array of different titles.

I have assumed that it is allowed and permitted or else it wouldn't be so widespread.

18 posted on 10/10/2003 6:13:42 PM PDT by Brian S (Government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem...RWReagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
I emailed Bill Straub, I'll let you know if he responds.

Thanks.

19 posted on 10/10/2003 6:14:12 PM PDT by dighton (Nasty Little Clique™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
. Remind people that the California recall was a historic event in California history, that it represents a referendum on 30 years of failed liberal policies.

OR that the mood of the people is to vote to "throw all the bastards out, incumbents beware!!!.... :)

20 posted on 10/10/2003 6:17:02 PM PDT by Brian S (Government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem...RWReagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson