[zoyd]

You are feasting at the red meat of political opportunity, no different than Bill and Hillary would do in the same situation, IMO.

Yeah, you could never be accused of feasting on the red meat of political opportunity... {snort}.

I just have the belief that if it were, say, Bill or Hillary who was admitting an addiction to hillbilly heroin, the responses from the Rush-lovers would be decidedly different. Do you think that's an unfair conclusion?

[Dane]

I just have the belief that if it were, say, Bill or Hillary who was admitting an addiction to hillbilly heroin, the responses from the Rush-lovers would be decidedly different. Do you think that's an unfair conclusion?

Well gee, as President of the United States, Bill Clinton pointed his finger at me and said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" with his co-enabler Hillary by his side.

Rush admitted his demons today, he deserves all of our support and prayers, IMO.

[Qwinn]

"I just have the belief that if it were, say, Bill or Hillary who was admitting an addiction to hillbilly heroin, the responses from the Rush-lovers would be decidedly different. Do you think that's an unfair conclusion?"

Some would - there are always people on the fringe. Most Freepers wouldn't, I don't think. For myself, if Bill or Hillary had a drug addiction, came clean about it (yes, even if only because they were caught) and took responsibility (and jail time if required for it), yes, I would actually respect them more for how they handled the situation.

It wouldn't change any of the other reasons I despise them... but I wouldn't condemn them for -that-. I would still continue, however, to condemn Clinton as the President that enacted the most draconian anti-marijuana laws ever seen in this country for it's own sake.

Qwinn