Replies

"Uh Qwinnie, if you want me to answer your posts, you should actually try to "ping" me, like you did not in your reply #992."

Sorry, I'm new to this board, have no idea what "pinging" is yet.

"BTW, it is interesting that during the Clinton administartion that the majority of the pro-marijuana initiatives were passed(you know a president of the United States saying that he didn't "inhale" and all that schtick), but in the first off year election in the GW Bush administration(2002) the three major pro-drug state intitiatives(AZ, OH, and NV), financed BTW, by Hillary friend George Soros, all went down to resounding defeats."

And this relates to the links I gave that actively demonstrate that Clinton enacted the most draconian anti-marijuana laws in history HOW?

You give no link. You establish no facts. I show how even the ACLU has a problem with Bill "I didn't inhale" Clinton's marijuana laws and you're completely ignoring the evidence I've presented.

BTW, one person being "friends" with someone else means exactly zero to me. I am friends with lots of people who disagree with me on some issues, including this one. If being friends with someone proves something, then the only thing I can think of is that you have clearly established that the Clintons are hypocrites in their choice of friends.

"Oh yeah, I will wait for your kicking Rush while he is down reply and reveling in it like your Libertarian brethren are."

What are you talking about? I've been defending Rush. And I'm not a Libertarian. I'm pro-life ferchrissakes. Social and fiscal conservative. Decriminalization of pot and prison time for users is, to me, an issue of competing priorities. Plus the fact that Clinton and California's legislature went so over the top in punishing it that someone in California is mandated to serve twice as much prison time for pot possession as the average time served for murder.

Qwinn

And this relates to the links I gave that actively demonstrate that Clinton enacted the most draconian anti-marijuana laws in history HOW?

Uh by Clinton's non-leadership on the drug issue. Hey the election results don't lie. In 2002 with Clinton out of the White House all the pro-drug states intitatives failed misreably, while with Clinton in the White House the most pro-drug state intitatives passed.