To: John123
Agree. A spell-checker would be useful for us spelling-challenged.
To: Eric in the Ozarks; John123
I'm bad with proof reading my posts. It is a message board. But for those that worry about spelling errors can use a free online one like
http://www.spellcheck.net
57 posted on
10/10/2003 7:53:00 AM PDT by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
A dictionary works wonders and keeps your mind operating. You might just be amazed at how good a speller you can be. A spell checker gets no credit for good spelling.
84 posted on
10/10/2003 8:01:23 AM PDT by
wita
To: Eric in the Ozarks; John123
Agree. A spell-checker would be useful for us spelling-challenged.You can't be series!
To: Eric in the Ozarks
"A spell-checker would be useful for us spelling-challenged."
Yeah. But then we would never have any hugh or series posts.
To: Eric in the Ozarks; John123
You can type your replies into a word processing or Email software that has spell check, and copy / paste them into the FR reply window.
263 posted on
10/10/2003 11:10:55 AM PDT by
GretchenEE
(Liberals CANNOT be trusted with national security (excepting maybe Congr. Norm Dicks.)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Agree. A spell-checker would be useful for us spelling-challenged.
Aside from a short post like this, I compose my responses in MS Word to catch any misspellings and then cut and paste. It keeps me from making too many mistakes.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson